My first email was wrong, and i don't want to criticize anybody work, don't want to insult anybody, and really don't want to start a war.
Apologies again 2014-10-02 13:55 GMT+02:00 Imre Kaloz <ka...@openwrt.org>: > John, > > Please mind your manners and keep the discussion at a professional level. > I doubt Etienne wanted to insult you or criticize your work, and it's true > that we did not announce of the availability of final binaries yet. > > > Imre > > > On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:30:41 +0200, John Crispin <blo...@openwrt.org> > wrote: > > >> no its certainly farting. i have you 2 and about 1 other person >> complain. the other 95% sent me mails with nice and simple questions and >> input and so forth. >> >> i just had a look, yesterday i got related to BB >> >> * 8 "thank you" mails >> * 6 mails asking for various support things >> * 4 pkg maintainers ask for help/logs >> * 2 devs asking for root on the build server >> * 2 people reminded me that now BB is out of the way that i promised to >> fix NCM, hwdetect, ... >> * 2 mails of people voicing wishes for CC >> * 2 driver fixes for i2c on mediatek ..... >> * and etiennes mails and your reply >> >> sorry but looking at those numbers it is farting that you are doing. >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 02/10/2014 07:01, Hanno Schupp wrote: >> >>> I think this is his point, mate: You work hard (in isolation), but >>> don't communicate. >>> If you want to avoid emails that smell like farts to you, why not tell >>> people what's going on? >>> >>> On 2 October 2014 17:51, John Crispin <blo...@openwrt.org >>> <mailto:blo...@openwrt.org>> wrote: >>> >>> nice rant, what happened at mignight that you got so angry that you >>> feel you needed to vent it out on us ? >>> >>> i would like to point out that the BB-final binaries have been online >>> for over a day. currently the root filesystems only hold a opkg.conf >>> with base and luci. last night we regenerated the files so that the >>> opkg.conf holds all feeds. >>> >>> while you were busy farting we were busy working. but thanks for the >>> nice mail. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/10/2014 23:59, Etienne Champetier wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > OpenWRT is a wonderfull piece of open source code, and it would be >>> > really great if the project management could be as open as the >>> > code. BB should be out now but for an unknow reason, it's not, and >>> > it's frustating. If some feature are missing, let people know. If >>> > some bugs need to be killed, let the community help. If buildbots >>> > are broken, let someone provide new ones. Open a TODO list on an >>> > etherpad, involve people. Whatever the reasons are, i'm sure some >>> > people can help. >>> > >>> > When you open the process, you get more work done (see new packages >>> > feed). >>> > >>> > Please communicate!!! >>> > >>> > Thanks Etienne >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel >>> > mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>> <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> >>> > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> openwrt-devel mailing list >>> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >>> <mailto:openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org> >>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
