Hi,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> It will be more complete if dnsmasq-dhcpv6 is also covered by this
> config option. Even better is letting this option depend on the
> actual dnsmasq build variant selected.
As mentioned in the cover letter: while the config option sho
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Steven Barth wrote:
> could you please add nettle-mini support and make this a build variant
> instead of a config option, please?
> Build variant has the advantage that we can precompile it as ipks because we
> cannot enable dnssec by default.
I posted a pa
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Andre Heider wrote:
>> could you please add nettle-mini support and make this a build variant
>> instead of a config option, please?
>> Build variant has the advantage that we can precompile it as ipks because we
>> cannot enable dnssec by default.
> I posted a pa
Hi,
thanks for this.
my intention was more to add one build-variant dnsmasq-full with
standard + dhcpv6 + authoritative + dnssec. As dnssec adds hundreds of
KB of dependencies anyway I don't think the 10 or 20 KB of the other
features make it particularly worse or worth adding variants for ev
Hi Mikko,
On 11/06/2014 17:01, Mikko Hissa wrote:
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c 2014-04-27
> 10:09:21.566294160 +0300 b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c 2014-06-09
> 11:27:48.952211672 +0300 +@@ -793,8 +793,11 @@ + { + struct { +
> __be32 magic; +- __be32 pad[2]; ++
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Andre Heider wrote:
>>> could you please add nettle-mini support and make this a build variant
>>> instead of a config option, please?
>>> Build variant has the advantage that we can precompile it
Hi Nikos,
Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way
to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in.
The main problem here is that this increase the default image size
significantly plus we can't even reuse all the added crypto code because
none o
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth wrote:
> Hi Nikos,
> Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way
> to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in.
> The main problem here is that this increase the default image size
> significantly plus w
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Steven Barth wrote:
> my intention was more to add one build-variant dnsmasq-full with standard +
> dhcpv6 + authoritative + dnssec. As dnssec adds hundreds of KB of
> dependencies anyway I don't think the 10 or 20 KB of the other features make
> it particularly w
On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project
under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety
of software; polarssl is closed commercial project under a commercial
license with a GPLv2 exception.
Oh well, I sometimes have the feeling if its open-source
That sounds better, but on the other side users wanting only dhcpv6
then get quite a lot of DNSSEC bloat.
I don't have numbers at hand, but we could explore static
libnettle-mini linking?
No, I wasn't thinking about dropping the dhcpv6 variant just to add the
full variant as number 3 so we have
On 16.06.2014 10:40, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Steven Barth wrote:
>> > Hi Nikos,
>> > Is there a reason for not having dnssec by default? If there is a way
>> > to disable it, I believe it will only be beneficial to have it in.
>> > The main problem here i
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Steven Barth wrote:
>
>> That sounds better, but on the other side users wanting only dhcpv6
>> then get quite a lot of DNSSEC bloat.
>> I don't have numbers at hand, but we could explore static
>> libnettle-mini linking?
>
> No, I wasn't thinking about dropping t
Hi,
There is a bug in AA regarding IPv6 multicast support for the AR9341
switch (at least on a TP-Link TL-WR841N v8 device). Basically, it breaks
IPv6 Neighbour Discovery, which seriously limits IPv6 functionality.
See this ticket:
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/15448
In particular, a patch
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>> On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project
>> under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety
>> of software; polarssl is closed commercial project under a commercial
>> license with a GPLv2 exception.
> acc
On 16.06.2014 11:56, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>>> On the contrary I'd prefer if it doesn't. Nettle is an open project
>>> under LGPL that anyone can contribute and can be reused by a variety
>>> of software; polarssl is closed commercial project un
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:57:20AM +0200, Andre Heider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Yousong Zhou wrote:
> > It will be more complete if dnsmasq-dhcpv6 is also covered by this
> > config option. Even better is letting this option depend on the
> > actual dnsmasq build varian
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 00:19 +0200, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > This applies to ocserv at the github packages repository of openwrt:
> > https://github.com/openwrt/packages
>
> Hello any comments one the above two additions? I'm mostly worried how
> can that be added to luci as these program
Didn't hear back on this, and realized I didn't quite format the previous
email correctly.
Ran into a problem SSHing into an Openwrt router from a Fedora machine.
Fedora sets terminfo to xterm-256color, but ncurses installed in openwrt
doesn't include that file in the firmware. This causes a few
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Gui Iribarren wrote:
> On 06/12/2014 09:13 PM, Shankar Unni wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > How can I look up the current state of the various wireless interfaces
> using "uci" now?
> >
>
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network#determining.linux.interface.names
>
> The
Hi,
the data is cached upon the first call.
To force a resync, run "network_flush_cache".
~ Jow
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mai
hello, I can be a beta test if you want :-)
Enviada do meu iPhone
> Em 04/06/2014, às 10:05, John Crispin escreveu:
>
> octeon is currently only partially working. we will push a fix to
> trunk in the next few days. experimental patch is currently in
> testing. please be patient for a few dyas
22 matches
Mail list logo
