On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote: > >> That sounds better, but on the other side users wanting only dhcpv6 >> then get quite a lot of DNSSEC bloat. >> I don't have numbers at hand, but we could explore static >> libnettle-mini linking? > > No, I wasn't thinking about dropping the dhcpv6 variant just to add the full > variant as number 3 so we have standard, dhcpv6 and full. Does that make > sense?
D'oh, got it now. Sounds good to me. I'll do just that for the next set. Thanks, Andre _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
