Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] AT91: Add flexibity board support

2011-08-06 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 07/03/2011 09:19 PM, Maxim Osipov wrote: > Thank you, the patch will follow shortly. > > Maxim > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:57 PM, John Crispin wrote: >> On 03/07/11 20:54, John Crispin wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> applied in r27412 >>> >>> i dropped the dhcp and system uci file. could you use uci-

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v3] AT91: Add flexibity board support

2011-08-06 Thread Maxim Osipov
> > Could you please make a patch to reduce the number of options selected > in at91/flexibity/config-2.6.39 and extend at91/config-default if necessary. > Hi Hauke, I'm working to update Flexibity support in OpenWRT and will send an updated patch soon. Regards, Maxim ___

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Update Openswan to upstream 2.6.34

2011-08-06 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 07/22/2011 01:21 AM, Stephen Oberholtzer wrote: > [PATCH] Update Openswan to upstream 2.6.34 > > OpenWRT's bulid process currently uses Openswan v2.6.33, which does not build > against the 2.6.39 kernel. > This patch updates the OpenWRT build process to build Openswan v2.6.34, > released 2011

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH-v3] samba 3.0.37 update

2011-08-06 Thread Maarten Bezemer
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:50 +0200, Cezary Jackiewicz wrote: > > I assumed that since it is available as external library, it would be > > better to use this external (shared) library to save some space. Now I > > realize that it is statically linked and my assumption is incorrect and > > resulting

[OpenWrt-Devel] Discussion about overwriting config files by another package

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Macura
Hi to all, please I would want to open discussion about creating more complex package which needs to overwrite configs of other packages. I want to find "clean" way to do this. I will try to explain. We are creating BESIP (Bright Embedded Solution for IP Telephony). Entire project is based on Op

[OpenWrt-Devel] Cmake and FORTIFY_SOURCE

2011-08-06 Thread Lukas Macura
Hi to all, We needed to use libssh library for our usage and we found, that this package depends on FORTIFY_SOURCE. It means, it needs to be build outside of its source directory. This AFAIK breaks standard openwrt package build. We have to use small patch, which tells to openwrt build process, t

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] kmod-input-xxx: missing dependency on kmod-input-core

2011-08-06 Thread Hauke Mehrtens
On 07/28/2011 03:31 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Modules like input-gpio-keys rely on input-core, but that's not currently > expressed. > > Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville > This patch is wrong. x86 has input-core compiled into the kernel and for all other targets there is already a depe

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] kmod-input-xxx: missing dependency on kmod-input-core

2011-08-06 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 8/6/11 10:09 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 07/28/2011 03:31 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> Modules like input-gpio-keys rely on input-core, but that's not currently >> expressed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville >> > This patch is wrong. > > x86 has input-core compiled into the kerne

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 1/1] kmod-input-xxx: missing dependency on kmod-input-core

2011-08-06 Thread Philip Prindeville
On 8/6/11 2:31 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On 8/6/11 10:09 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: >> On 07/28/2011 03:31 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> Modules like input-gpio-keys rely on input-core, but that's not currently >>> expressed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Philip Prindeville >>> >> This patch is

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Discussion about overwriting config files by another package

2011-08-06 Thread ch...@martin.cc
Have a look at /etc/ucidefaults. In this directory you place scripts that are only run once, on the first boot. Your package can place scripts there that up date config files by copying, or by using the uci command to add the extras you need On 06/08/2011 11:47 PM, "Lukas Macura" wrote: > > Hi to