Re: ustream-ssl ABI_VERSION usage

2024-02-13 Thread Daniel Golle
On 13 February 2024 17:39:29 UTC, Paul Spooren wrote: >Hi, > >> On Feb 12, 2024, at 14:30, Petr Štetiar wrote: >> >> Jo-Philipp Wich [2024-02-12 14:09:27]: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Ideally all packages specifying an ABI version should ship versioned .so >>> files >>> as well. >> >> I would like t

Re: ustream-ssl ABI_VERSION usage

2024-02-13 Thread Paul Spooren
Hi, > On Feb 12, 2024, at 14:30, Petr Štetiar wrote: > > Jo-Philipp Wich [2024-02-12 14:09:27]: > > Hi, > >> Ideally all packages specifying an ABI version should ship versioned .so >> files >> as well. > > I would like to point out, that ustream-ssl is dynamically loaded library[1], > so

Re: ustream-ssl ABI_VERSION usage

2024-02-12 Thread Petr Štetiar
Jo-Philipp Wich [2024-02-12 14:09:27]: Hi, > Ideally all packages specifying an ABI version should ship versioned .so files > as well. I would like to point out, that ustream-ssl is dynamically loaded library[1], so we would need to pass that ABI information somehow to the clients, so they wou

Re: ustream-ssl ABI_VERSION usage

2024-02-12 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi Paul, While working on using APK instead of OPKG, I started to look into ABI versions of different packages and found that ustream-ssl always install libustream-ssl.so , with no ABI version attached. $(INSTALL_DATA) $(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)/usr/lib/libustream-ssl.so $(1