On 12-12-02 03:04 PM, Jiri Slachta wrote:
>
> Hello Brian,
Hi Jiri,
> I am just following those recommendations in AA beta announcement:
Ahhh. I thought you were making a more authoritative recommendation.
> The kernel 2.4 support has been dropped from Attitude Adjustment.
I never used the ke
Dne 2.12.2012 20:43, Brian J. Murrell napsal(a):
> On 12-12-02 01:16 PM, Jiri Slachta wrote:
>>
>> Hello Chris,
>
> Hi Jiri,
>
Hello Brian,
>> at least for those two Linksys boxes sticking with Backfire is recommended.
>
> I wonder what the rationale is for this recommendation.
I am just follow
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 14:43:55 -0500,
"Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
I wonder what the rationale is for this recommendation.
I tried AA on a couple of old Buffalo devices and it had problems. I think
services were getting killed because of lack of memory.
One of my devices doesn't work with
On 12-12-02 01:16 PM, Jiri Slachta wrote:
>
> Hello Chris,
Hi Jiri,
> at least for those two Linksys boxes sticking with Backfire is recommended.
I wonder what the rationale is for this recommendation.
> For devices with 16 MB RAM or slower CPU's (less than 200 MHz) is recommended
> to stick w
On 02/12/12 18:16, Jiri Slachta wrote:
Dne 2.12.2012 18:42, Christian Gagneraud napsal(a):
Hi,
I'm planning to do a workshop at the Dublin hacker space.
I know that Attitude Adjustment is not yet released, but i wonder if it is
stable enough, or if, instead, I should use Backfire 10.03.1.
So
Dne 2.12.2012 18:42, Christian Gagneraud napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to do a workshop at the Dublin hacker space.
> I know that Attitude Adjustment is not yet released, but i wonder if it is
> stable enough, or if, instead, I should use Backfire 10.03.1.
>
> So far, the list of routers we
