Dne 2.12.2012 20:43, Brian J. Murrell napsal(a): > On 12-12-02 01:16 PM, Jiri Slachta wrote: >> >> Hello Chris, > > Hi Jiri, > Hello Brian, >> at least for those two Linksys boxes sticking with Backfire is recommended. > > I wonder what the rationale is for this recommendation.
I am just following those recommendations in AA beta announcement: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=39117 The kernel 2.4 support has been dropped from Attitude Adjustment. Also I saw some users complaining about lack of memory on current trunk or AA on older devices. > >> For devices with 16 MB RAM or slower CPU's (less than 200 MHz) is >> recommended to stick with Backfire. > > What's consuming more RAM and CPU in AA when compared to Backfire -- > assuming one only runs the same set of services on both of them? > I think it's a rule that new functionality also raises minimal memory requirements. It's a recommendation for older devices to stick with backfire, but you can build an image on your own without services you do not need to fit in a small amount of memory. :-) > Given this recommendation, will any of the buffbloat work that's been > done (which raises the question about how much of the bufferbloat work > is in AA) and still to be done be backported to Backfire? > I can't say. I don't know. :-( > Cheers, > b. _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
