> > To: Adrian Schmutzler ; Denis Kalashnikov
> >
> > Cc: OpenWrt Development List ; Gabor
> > Juhos ; Koen Vandeputte
> >
> > Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G
> >
> > Hello Adrian and Denis,
> >
> > s
#x27;Gabor Juhos' ; 'Sergey Ryazanov'
>
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G
>
>
> On 23.05.21 11:01, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> > ...
> >> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
> >> b/targe
Vandeputte
>
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G
>
> Hello Adrian and Denis,
>
> sorry for interfering with your conversation, I would like to discuss the best
> way to document not yet finished functionality. Please find my question an
On 23.05.21 11:01, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
...
diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
index 74f8603b5a..0072ec527d 100644
--- a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
+++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
@@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ define Device/mikr
> I am just curious, why did you place beeper and LEDs in the root node,
> but specify latch and NAND as the AHB bus child nodes?
Ack, you are right.
> > + /* NAND control gpios */
> > + read-gpios = <&gpio_latch 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + rdy-gpios = <&g
Hello Sergey
> the device tree has a dualistic
> nature, on one hand it is a place for driver configuration, on the
> other hand it is a way to document board stuff interconnections
I agree with you here, but I don't think that I should insist on this.
Hello Adrian
> > +&spi {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + compatible = "qca,ar7100-spi";
> > +
> > + cs-gpios = <0>, <&gpio_latch 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>
> Are you sure you need cs-gpios here? We've removed it everywhere else (for
> &spi node):
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/com
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:05 PM Denis Kalashnikov wrote:
>
> This board has been supported in the ar71xx.
>
> Links:
> * https://mikrotik.com/product/RB912UAG-2HPnD
> * https://mikrotik.com/product/RB912UAG-5HPnD
> * https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/mikrotik/mikrotik_rb912uag-2hpnd
> * https://openw
Hello Adrian and Denis,
sorry for interfering with your conversation, I would like to discuss
the best way to document not yet finished functionality. Please find
my question and proposal below.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 12:01 PM Adrian Schmutzler
wrote:
[skipped]
>> + beeper {
>> +
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Denis Kalashnikov
> Sent: Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 13:05
> To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Gabor Juhos ; Koen Vandeputte
> ; Sergey Ryazanov
>
> Subject: [RFC v2 3/3] ath7
10 matches
Mail list logo
