The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Dzień dobry,
w jaki sposób zarząd
Otherwise it's quite hard to track such issues. While at it, be DRY and
use UJAIL_BIN_PATH constant for ujail binary.
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar
---
service/instance.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/service/instance.c b/service/instance.c
index 14d
On 3/5/19 12:35 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The European commission asked for feedback on the Radio Equipment
> Directive (RED) regarding the restrictions on "Upload of software on
> radio equipment"
>
> I posted here a comment in the name of the OpenWrt
Eric Luehrsen writes:
> On 3/4/19 6:35 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The European commission asked for feedback on the Radio Equipment
>> Directive (RED) regarding the restrictions on "Upload of software on
>> radio equipment"
>>
>
On 3/4/19 6:35 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
Hi,
The European commission asked for feedback on the Radio Equipment
Directive (RED) regarding the restrictions on "Upload of software on
radio equipment"
I posted here a comment in the name of the OpenWrt project:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/
Hi,
The European commission asked for feedback on the Radio Equipment
Directive (RED) regarding the restrictions on "Upload of software on
radio equipment"
I posted here a comment in the name of the OpenWrt project:
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-20
On 27/02/19 15:04, Buddy wrote:
Engineer:
I am installed openwrt firmware 18.06.2 in Linksys WRT1900AC .
Installed AdBlock,but could not to add more rule resource.
For blocked more ADs , changed hosts to a big one that over
150MB,so the changes is spend 60% Memory,
Engineer:
I am installed openwrt firmware 18.06.2 in Linksys WRT1900AC .
Installed AdBlock,but could not to add more rule resource.
For blocked more ADs , changed hosts to a big one that over
150MB,so the changes is spend 60% Memory,hope have a good ways to deal with.
Hi,
I have a proposal for a Google Summer of Code idea:
https://github.com/freifunk/projects.freifunk.net-contents/pull/30
Would this be a desired/good idea?
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mail
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 10:14:03 Saverio Proto wrote:
> > who says that we have to involve them into a decisional process? All they
> > do is offer money for some projects in which industry partners are
> > interested in as well. Of course, bringing the contributions back to
> > upstream should be
> who says that we have to involve them into a decisional process? All they do
> is offer money for some projects in which industry partners are interested in
> as well. Of course, bringing the contributions back to upstream should be made
> a requirement, but I don't really see anything bad in thi
Hey Saverio,
On Wednesday 09 March 2016 09:58:57 Saverio Proto wrote:
> > I don't have a number off hand, that's still being decided. My feeling has
> > been that's it'd be in the tens of thousands USD total. I'll try to get
> > more of finalized amount as soon as possible.
>
> Hello Eric,
>
> c
opment, documentation, and
other tasks deemed useful to the community was discussed. In the past
couple days, Art Swift (prpl Pres) had the opportunity to obtain
high-level feedback from a few carriers and operators who have been
participating in the Home Gateway Initiative (HGI). Some use OpenWrt
and w
:11 PM, openwrt-devel-requ...@lists.openwrt.org wrote:
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Request for Feedback - prplwrt Software
Support Program - initial draft
Message-ID:<56e09167.3000...@openwrt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 2016-03-09 17:46, Kathy Giori wrote:
>Saveri
gt; silicon vendor SDK support on top of OpenWrt should be
> pushed/integrated with OpenWrt as much as possible.
I think plenty of OpenWrt developers already frequently raise their
voices. What's needed is for the industry to not just listen, but also
to communicate back. For that to be effecti
.
These are useful to expose industry and community developers to each
other so that they can better collaborate, openly and/or under
contract.
3. Positive feedback. If early funding cycle projects are a big
success, highly valued by prpl members (and the community), then I
would expect that subseque
> I don't have a number off hand, that's still being decided. My feeling has
> been that's it'd be in the tens of thousands USD total. I'll try to get more
> of finalized amount as soon as possible.
Hello Eric,
considering that a Senior Engineer in the SF Bay Area has an average
income of 120.000
Linus,
Sure, I'd be happy to clarify. We had an internal discussion in prpl about
what the best way to focus the proposals for prpl funding. As with any
group of funders, there was some tension between having a totally unfocused
set of proposals about any topic and proposals that fulfill the goals
Felix,
Oops, forgot to respond to the prplwrt repo question. When prpl was getting
started, it wasn't clear if we wanted to create our own fork of OpenWrt or
not. There wasn't much interest in doing that so I just ended up deleting
it. I think we're more interested in working with the core OpenWrt
Felix,
I don't have a number off hand, that's still being decided. My feeling has
been that's it'd be in the tens of thousands USD total. I'll try to get
more of finalized amount as soon as possible.
Eric
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-03-04 18:42, Eric Schultz
ng the prplwrt Software Support
> Program
> > (PSSP)
> >
> > PSSP will fund innovative OpenWrt development work that is responsive to
> > the needs of the OpenWrt community and industry. To make sure the process
> > benefits the community as much as possible, I
rt Software Support Program
> (PSSP)
>
> PSSP will fund innovative OpenWrt development work that is responsive to
> the needs of the OpenWrt community and industry. To make sure the process
> benefits the community as much as possible, I'm asking for your feedback.
> Please l
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:07:22PM -0600, Eric Schultz wrote:
> * prpl and its members, as funders, would set initial themes that all
> projects would be expected to fit into.
Could you clarify what you mean with "initial themes", maybe some
examples?
What would happen if the OpenWRT community we
On 2016-03-04 18:42, Eric Schultz wrote:
> Saverio,
>
> No problem, I'm happy to clarify. prplwrt is a working group in prpl
> Foundation, which is a membership organization focusing on open source
> and industry. prplwrt in particular has the following mission: "The
> mission of the prplwrt PEG i
rogram
> > (PSSP)
> >
> > PSSP will fund innovative OpenWrt development work that is responsive to
> the
> > needs of the OpenWrt community and industry. To make sure the process
> > benefits the community as much as possible, I'm asking for your feedback.
benefits the community as much as possible, I'm asking for your feedback.
> Please look through the document I've linked below and provide feedback,
> either as comments on the document or as a reply to this message.
>
> As a quick summary, the process would go as follows:
&
rk that is responsive to
the needs of the OpenWrt community and industry. To make sure the process
benefits the community as much as possible, I'm asking for your feedback.
Please look through the document I've linked below and provide feedback,
either as comments on the document or as a reply
Hello Derek,
Thanks for trying SQM.
On Dec 28, 2014, at 03:29 , Derek & Vicky wrote:
> I've installed and configured the SQM QOS module for my Bleeding Edge, r43718
> access point. The access point runs on the sunxi A20 processor with 1
> Ethernet and 1 USB powered Wifi adapter. A 5 port s
I've installed and configured the SQM QOS module for my Bleeding Edge,
r43718 access point. The access point runs on the sunxi A20 processor
with 1 Ethernet and 1 USB powered Wifi adapter. A 5 port switch with
VLAN 802.1q support is connected to the 1 Ethernet port to give the
access point e
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:24:10AM -0800, Peter Naulls wrote:
> Finally, for all this to hang together, we need to note that
> the "real" system failed to boot, and then run a recovery
> upon reboot to recovery. Where would be the best place to
> make a record of that fact?
uboot-env?
Luka
I need some ideas on the final park of my fallback mechanism which I've
mentioned here. My issue is really how to make the partitioning work
properly.
The goal is to, without modifying the board u-boot, and assuming
enough space for a backup system in flash, allow the system to
still boot to
Until now the following people have "signed in":
bartman007
-nathan
glp (better add myself)
and the following have shown a potential interest:
iam
ggp81
Chz
--
Gregers Petersen, Anthropologist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.wireless-ownership.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
32 matches
Mail list logo
