On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 09:38:01 +
Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Hi, Ansuel,
>
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 01:08, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> >
> >
> > So.. how should we proceed with this? From what I understand the idea is to
> > merge this ASAP.
>
> But not a moment sooner. ;) I'm sure we agree that th
Hi, Ansuel,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 01:08, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>
>
> So.. how should we proceed with this? From what I understand the idea is to
> merge this ASAP.
But not a moment sooner. ;) I'm sure we agree that this patch won't be
merged upstream in its current form, according to the comment
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:14:50PM +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 21:11, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > Should we follow the suggestion and add a specific attribute just for DSA?
> > I believe that would be the right thing to do, but I'd like to know
> > what Daniel a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 09:14:50PM +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 21:11, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> >
> > Should we follow the suggestion and add a specific attribute just for DSA?
> I believe that would be the right thing to do, but I'd like to know
> what Daniel and Marek think
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 21:11, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>
>
> Should we follow the suggestion and add a specific attribute just for DSA?
I believe that would be the right thing to do, but I'd like to know
what Daniel and Marek think about it too.
___
openwrt
>
> Hi, Ansuel,
>
> After reading the patch more carefully, I have to say I'm really not fond of
> it in its current form, especially considering that the original feedback
> from Stephen Hemminger and Vladimir Oltean [1] hasn't been addressed. To be
> honest, overloading the IFLA_LINK attribute
[Apologies for resending, Gmail turned my message into HTML behind my back.]
Hi, Ansuel,
After reading the patch more carefully, I have to say I'm really not
fond of it in its current form, especially considering that the
original feedback from Stephen Hemminger and Vladimir Oltean [1]
hasn't bee
Hi again,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 15:56, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
>
> Nice, but we'll need to do the same for BusyBox's ip applet. Let's not
> force everyone who needs multi-CPU DSA to install iproute2's ip just
> for this case. ;)
Just to clarify, I'll take care of the BusyBox side of things, don't
Hi, Ansuel,
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 15:11, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>
> Add support for link set useful to set CPU port for dsa drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith
> ---
> ...-iplink_allow_to_change_iplink_value.patch | 94 +++
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
> create mode 10
Add support for link set useful to set CPU port for dsa drivers.
Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith
---
...-iplink_allow_to_change_iplink_value.patch | 94 +++
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
package/network/utils/iproute2/patches/191-iplink_allow_to_change_iplink_
10 matches
Mail list logo
