Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipq40xx: net: phy: qca807x: fix GPIO driver

2021-03-04 Thread Christian Lamparter
On 04/03/2021 14:36, Robert Marko wrote: It's my fault, I exported it as a part of the patch series with unrelated patches and git-send much have picked that up. There is no 2/2. Do you want me to export it again and resend it? Oh no, that's certainly not necessary ;) Cheers, Christian _

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipq40xx: net: phy: qca807x: fix GPIO driver

2021-03-04 Thread Robert Marko
It's my fault, I exported it as a part of the patch series with unrelated patches and git-send much have picked that up. There is no 2/2. Do you want me to export it again and resend it? Regards On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:21 PM Christian Lamparter wrote: > > Hello, > > is there a PATCH 2/2 for i

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipq40xx: net: phy: qca807x: fix GPIO driver

2021-03-04 Thread Christian Lamparter
Hello, is there a PATCH 2/2 for ipq40xx too? Or was that 1/2 in the subject just because the file got copied around? Cheers Christian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-dev

[PATCH 1/2] ipq40xx: net: phy: qca807x: fix GPIO driver

2021-03-04 Thread Robert Marko
While rebasing into setting bits instead of magic values, I accidentally forgot to actually set the force bit. Without it using the pins as GPIO-s did not actually work. Fixes: b5c93ed ("ipq40xx: add Qualcomm QCA807x driver") Signed-off-by: Robert Marko --- target/linux/ipq40xx/files/drivers/n