Thanks for the answer.
I'm aware of the difference between GPL or LGPL. My question was
mostly to try to figure why there was a difference between the library
and the lua binding
Having the library in LGPLv2.1 seems to show a certain intent while
having GPLv2 on the Lua binding shows a different in
On 13.08.2013 21:54, Jeff Remy wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question regarding the UCI Lua bindings license.
> libuci itself is LGPLv2.1, the cli utility is GPLv2 and the Lua
> bindings are GPLv2.
> I was wondering if this was on purpose?
> It does not seem to be in line with the library but again, ther
Hi,
I have a question regarding the UCI Lua bindings license.
libuci itself is LGPLv2.1, the cli utility is GPLv2 and the Lua
bindings are GPLv2.
I was wondering if this was on purpose?
It does not seem to be in line with the library but again, there might
be other reasons.
Anybody knows the ratio
