Le 15/04/2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit :
Hello,
> Right, handling of interface aliases is still somewhat problematic with
> the current firewall framework. I think you have to resort to custom
> rules for now.
So far, it works fine.
/etc/config/network
config 'alias'
option 'proto
Thursday 15 April 2010 15:20:26 Eric Masson napisał(a):
> Le 15/04/2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> > Right, handling of interface aliases is still somewhat problematic with
> > the current firewall framework. I think you have to resort to custom
> > rules for now.
>
> Ok.
>
> I
You did earlier (9.12.2009) ..
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2009-December/005384.html
anyway you are right. They can be pulled manually as well. These vars
were set in "white russian", but didn't survive "kamikaze". I feel they
are convenient.
LANDEV is missing because it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edgar,
I fail to see the purpose of this patch.
Why is WANDEV defined but not LANDEV?
Why this aliases and no general mechanism?
What happens if I renamed my wan interface, removed it etc.?
Why can't includes that need those vars just pull them?
~
Apropos custom rules .. this patch is still pending .. ede
On 15.04.2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Remaining problem is access to the dsl modem, a new zone should be
created to allow masquerading, and I don't see how eth0.1 could be in
wan& d
Le 15/04/2010 15:02, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit :
Hello,
> Right, handling of interface aliases is still somewhat problematic with
> the current firewall framework. I think you have to resort to custom
> rules for now.
Ok.
Is there any plan regarding firewall framework mods to support this kind
of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Remaining problem is access to the dsl modem, a new zone should be
> created to allow masquerading, and I don't see how eth0.1 could be in
> wan & dsl zones...
Right, handling of interface aliases is still somewhat problematic with
the current firew
Le 15/04/2010 14:03, Jo-Philipp Wich a écrit :
Hello,
> Did you try with an alias?
>
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network#aliases
Nope, I wasn't aware of this keyword.
I suppose that I should use 'wan' as parent interface.
I'll check asap whether it works or not (Box is in use for vpn acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you try with an alias?
http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network#aliases
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkvHAHQACgkQdputYINPTPPB5wCf
Hello,
I'm trying to make an ethernet interface support both PPPoE & static ip
address settings (goal is to access DSL modem administrative interface)
I've tried a setup like the following :
/etc/config/network
config 'switch' 'eth0'
option 'enable' '1'
config 'switch_vlan' 'eth0_0'
10 matches
Mail list logo