Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:13:58PM +1000, Andrew Byrne wrote:
> I've moved house recently and no longer have access to an ISP that
> provides native IPv6. This makes it difficult for me to test, however
> I will see what I can do.
Would it help if I provided a tunnel with DHCP-PD on it, pote
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 19:13 +1000, Andrew Byrne wrote:
>
> When I created this config file, it was based purely off the existing
> WIDE-DHCPv6 config file requirements.
>
> The only way to avoid this variable in the config file will be for
> someone to patch the source code so it automatically ca
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:43:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> It's documented here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dhcp6c
>
> Oh! This is tremendously cool! Thanks to everyone who made that
> possible.
>
> Nit to pick: calling
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 22:32 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:43:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > It's documented here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dhcp6c
>
> Oh! This is tremendously cool! Thanks to everyone who made that
> possible.
>
> Nit to pick: calling thi
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 01:33:00PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> > (And no, I wouldn't advocate 6to4 being enabled by default anyway).
>
> I had it enabled by default during comcast's trials. It worked great,
> on their network (and having a /48 was good too). It didn't work very
> well elsewhere
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:43:36PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> It's documented here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/dhcp6c
Oh! This is tremendously cool! Thanks to everyone who made that
possible.
Nit to pick: calling this "sla_len" is a bit weird. Especially if
you don't know whethe
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:43 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 20:14 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>> (Now, what I'm not sure whether OpenWRT already has this: to fully
>> utilize IPv6 over here, what you need to have is dynamic IPv6 prefix
>> support using DHCP-PD. As in "router q
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 20:14 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> (Now, what I'm not sure whether OpenWRT already has this: to fully
> utilize IPv6 over here, what you need to have is dynamic IPv6 prefix
> support using DHCP-PD. As in "router queries ISP for a prefix, ISP
> assigns 2001:db8:1::/56, router
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:40:00AM -0700, Bill Moffitt wrote:
> On the subject of being able to turn off V6, I agree with both sides,
> but with a caveat.
>
> On one side, V6 is necessary today in Asia, but, on the other had, it's
> not at all necessary or even desirable yet in North Americ
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 10:40 -0700, Bill Moffitt wrote:
>
>
> On the subject of being able to turn off V6, I agree with both sides,
> but with a caveat.
>
> On one side, V6 is necessary today in Asia, but, on the other had, it's
> not at all necessary or even desirable yet in North America and
On the subject of being able to turn off V6, I agree with both sides,
but with a caveat.
On one side, V6 is necessary today in Asia, but, on the other had, it's
not at all necessary or even desirable yet in North America and Europe,
so I think it is desirable to be able to turn it off.
Ri
11 matches
Mail list logo
