On 2010-11-03 7:26 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
> Am 02.11.2010 19:55, schrieb Felix Fietkau:
>> On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
>>> Just curious about
>>> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779
>>>
>>> Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be
>>
Am 02.11.2010 19:55, schrieb Felix Fietkau:
On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
Just curious about
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779
Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be
_1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchl
On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just curious about
> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779
>
> Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be
> _1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchlevel
> 0.9.30_3 ?
0.9.30.1
Hi,
Just curious about
https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779
Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be
_1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchlevel
0.9.30_3 ?
Please enlight me.
Regards,
Ossy
___