Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] removing uclibc versions

2010-11-03 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2010-11-03 7:26 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Am 02.11.2010 19:55, schrieb Felix Fietkau: >> On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: >>> Just curious about >>> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779 >>> >>> Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be >>

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] removing uclibc versions

2010-11-03 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Am 02.11.2010 19:55, schrieb Felix Fietkau: On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: Just curious about https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779 Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be _1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchl

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] removing uclibc versions

2010-11-02 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Hi, > > Just curious about > https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779 > > Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be > _1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchlevel > 0.9.30_3 ? 0.9.30.1

[OpenWrt-Devel] removing uclibc versions

2010-11-02 Thread Marcus Osdoba
Hi, Just curious about https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779 Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be _1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchlevel 0.9.30_3 ? Please enlight me. Regards, Ossy ___