On 2010-11-03 7:26 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: > Am 02.11.2010 19:55, schrieb Felix Fietkau: >> On 2010-11-02 7:39 PM, Marcus Osdoba wrote: >>> Just curious about .... >>> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk?rev=23779 >>> >>> Assuming 0.9.30_2 means higher patchlevel than 0.9.30_1 shouldn't it be >>> _1 and _2 who should be removed and preserve the highest patchlevel >>> 0.9.30_3 ? >> 0.9.30.1 is what's being used now. 0.9.31 is what's going to be used next. > Hi, Thanks for answering. I know, that 0.9.31 should be used. I was even > woundering, why OpenWrt does not default to it earlier. > BUT, the question was: why keeping a lower patchlevel and removing > higher ones. > > 0.9.30_1 <- still in trunk https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/23779 > 0.9.30_2 <- removed > 0.9.30_3 <- removed > > If I would switch to 0.9.31 and keep some 0.9.30 version as backup, I > would choose the highest patchlevel (which is 0.9.30_3 and not 0.9.30_1) > > Maybe there is some very rational reason for this... The rational reason is that since 0.9.30.1 has been selected for a while now, so it's the most tested version. And why bother keeping a backup of other versions that are never going to be used - this is all under version control anyway.
- Felix _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
