As Felix and John said, probably the best choice will be leave the
Lantiq subtargets with the current structure.
Additionally could be a good idea tuning the XWAY subtarget to 34kc
and enable dsp extensions to achieve better performance in the Danube,
AR9 and VR9 boards. This diff is an example of
2013/5/3, John Crispin :
> On 03/05/13 16:56, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2013-05-03 4:17 PM, José Vázquez Fernández wrote:
>>> As have been done previously in the ramips target the Lantiq target
>>> could be divided in subtargets based in the SoC (ase, danube, svip, ar9,
>>> vr9, ...).
>>> The bene
On 03/05/13 16:56, Felix Fietkau wrote:
On 2013-05-03 4:17 PM, José Vázquez Fernández wrote:
As have been done preciously in the ramips target the Lantiq target
could be divided in subtargets based in the SoC (ase, danube, svip, ar9,
vr9, ...) or the mips core (4k, 24k, 34k, ...), but the second
On 2013-05-03 4:17 PM, José Vázquez Fernández wrote:
> As have been done preciously in the ramips target the Lantiq target
> could be divided in subtargets based in the SoC (ase, danube, svip, ar9,
> vr9, ...) or the mips core (4k, 24k, 34k, ...), but the second option
> might be very confusing.
>
As have been done preciously in the ramips target the Lantiq target
could be divided in subtargets based in the SoC (ase, danube, svip, ar9,
vr9, ...) or the mips core (4k, 24k, 34k, ...), but the second option
might be very confusing.
The benefits will be the same as in ramips: better organization
