On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 23:18:10 +0200 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 6/11/20 6:58 PM, Ian Cooper wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:15:04 +0200 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/6/20 1:42 AM, Ian Cooper wrote:
> .
> >>
> >> As nothing activates GCC_LIBSSP it is always false. I think we can
>
On 6/11/20 6:58 PM, Ian Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:15:04 +0200 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>
>> On 6/6/20 1:42 AM, Ian Cooper wrote:
.
>>
>> As nothing activates GCC_LIBSSP it is always false. I think we can
>> remove this, this is not used by any package in the Kconfig part as far
>> a
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:15:04 +0200 Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 6/6/20 1:42 AM, Ian Cooper wrote:
> > Removes the standalone implementation of stack smashing protection
> > in gcc's libssp in favour of the native implementation in musl,
> > glibc and uClibc and introduces a uniform configuration in
On 6/6/20 1:42 AM, Ian Cooper wrote:
> Removes the standalone implementation of stack smashing protection
> in gcc's libssp in favour of the native implementation in musl,
> glibc and uClibc and introduces a uniform configuration interface.
>
> This also makes kernel-level stack smashing protectio
> Le 5 juin 2020 à 4:42 PM, Ian Cooper a écrit :
>
> Removes the standalone implementation of stack smashing protection
> in gcc's libssp in favour of the native implementation in musl,
> glibc and uClibc and introduces a uniform configuration interface.
>
> This also makes kernel-level stack
Removes the standalone implementation of stack smashing protection
in gcc's libssp in favour of the native implementation in musl,
glibc and uClibc and introduces a uniform configuration interface.
This also makes kernel-level stack smashing protection available
for builds using non-musl libc (sub
