On 2014-04-23 14:30, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think you should reuse option names used by other protocols, we
> already have far too much variation and abbreviation styles for common
> option names - see my comments inline below.
>
>> This patch adds protocol support for PPP over SSH.
On 23 April 2014 20:30, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think you should reuse option names used by other protocols, we
> already have far too much variation and abbreviation styles for common
> option names - see my comments inline below.
Thank you, jow. You are right on this. :)
>
>> This
Hi.
I think you should reuse option names used by other protocols, we
already have far too much variation and abbreviation styles for common
option names - see my comments inline below.
> This patch adds protocol support for PPP over SSH. The protocol name is
> 'pppossh' with the following optio
This patch adds protocol support for PPP over SSH. The protocol name is
'pppossh' with the following options.
- sshserver, required, SSH server name
- sshport, SSH server port
- sshuser, required, SSH login username
- identityfile, required, client private key file.
- localip, local ip addre