[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound (for real now)

2008-02-21 Thread Martin Metzker
This adds a package for the esound soundserver. I think I got it right now. Signed-off-by: Martin Metzker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- henschelring/martin/feeds/packages/sound/esound/Makefile 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ steffi/openwrt/feeds/packages/sound/esound/Makefile2008-02

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-12 Thread Gregers Petersen
Martin Metzker wrote: > Ok, and why do I have to add that big part starting with " The software in > this package falls into several categories"? The apache Makefile for example > doesn't contain any note about apache being distributed under a different > licence that GPLv2. Why is it ok with Ap

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-12 Thread Martin Metzker
Ok, and why do I have to add that big part starting with " The software in this package falls into several categories"? The apache Makefile for example doesn't contain any note about apache being distributed under a different licence that GPLv2. Why is it ok with Apache but not with EsounD? Mar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-10 Thread Gregers Petersen
Martin Metzker wrote: >> Since you copied and modified a file (the Makefile) which was licensed >> under the GPLv2, then aren't you required to keep that file under the GPLv2? >> > I have no clue. I suppose I have to, but about everything else I'm so > uncertain I decided I'd go with nothing bef

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-10 Thread Martin Metzker
> Since you copied and modified a file (the Makefile) which was licensed > under the GPLv2, then aren't you required to keep that file under the GPLv2? > I have no clue. I suppose I have to, but about everything else I'm so uncertain I decided I'd go with nothing before doing something wrong. >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-09 Thread Rod Whitby
Martin Metzker wrote: > I created that Makefile copying another Makefile and modifying it. > That's what I stripped: > # > # Copyright (C) 2007 OpenWrt.org > # > # This is free software, licensed under the GNU General Public License v2. > # See /LICENSE for more information. > # > # $Id: Makefile 9

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-09 Thread Martin Metzker
>> - write header: license and whatever needs to be put ther > Not a good idea to strip away the existing header (license and stuff) - > > IS the following (below) what you stripped away? [...] > No. I created that Makefile copying another Makefile and modifying it. That's what I stripped

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-09 Thread Gregers Petersen
Martin Metzker wrote: > This adds a package for the esound soundserver. I stripped the header > (license and stuff) for I have no clue what I have and/or may put there. > What needs to be done: > - write header: license and whatever needs to be put there > Not a good idea to strip away the existi

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] new package esound

2008-02-09 Thread Martin Metzker
This adds a package for the esound soundserver. I stripped the header (license and stuff) for I have no clue what I have and/or may put there. What needs to be done: - write header: license and whatever needs to be put there - check, double/ and tripplecheck. this is my first time to write somethi