-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
thanks - applied in r31374.
~ Jow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk+Rg7oACgkQdputYINPTPOVWgCfSWxkBOqoh5vpYm/b9NSe4PZe
6ccAn2KAQFZDb0A1s
hi
Another version, in this one the enable_server option is in the timeserver ntp
part of the "system" config file
You can patch trunk and bacfire (tested both)
You can put busybox ntpd in client mode (if you put server), in client & server
(by putting enable_server to 1, ntpd listen to udp 123)
I've now tested my trunk patch and it works fine
But I still can't find were $PROG is defined (is this a mistake, or some sort
of built in variable???)
(I've made some grep and nothing)
Le 23/03/2012 02:19, Philip Prindeville a écrit :
> Maybe:
>
> [ -n "$PROG" -a -x "$PROG" ] || return 1
>
> ins
Maybe:
[ -n "$PROG" -a -x "$PROG" ] || return 1
instead?
On 3/22/12 4:34 PM, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Hi
>
> The 2 attached patchs (trunk & bacfire) add busybox ntpd enable_server
> option, as busybox ntpd server is compiled by default.
> We only need 1 client/server daemon (olipro patch w
Hi
The 2 attached patchs (trunk & bacfire) add busybox ntpd enable_server option,
as busybox ntpd server is compiled by default.
We only need 1 client/server daemon (olipro patch was launching 2 daemons)
I've fully tested the bacfire patch, and as i don't have a running openwrt
trunk i'm not sur
On 1/14/12 11:37 AM, Olipro wrote:
> On Saturday 14 Jan 2012 02:45:59 Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> Don't we already have a 'disabled' option? Now we're adding an
>> 'enable_server' option?
>>
>> That seems confusing for no useful reason.
>>
>
> have you bothered to read what I originally wrote? y
On Saturday 14 Jan 2012 02:45:59 Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Don't we already have a 'disabled' option? Now we're adding an
> 'enable_server' option?
>
> That seems confusing for no useful reason.
>
have you bothered to read what I originally wrote? your response would make
me inclined to beli
Don't we already have a 'disabled' option? Now we're adding an 'enable_server'
option?
That seems confusing for no useful reason.
On 1/10/12 9:12 AM, Olipro wrote:
> Busybox currently has an ntpd, but the initscript currently only starts up
> a client version; a small modification is needed t
Busybox currently has an ntpd, but the initscript currently only starts up
a client version; a small modification is needed to start up an additional
daemon that can operate as a server.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Smith
Index: package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/sysntpd
=
