On 2013-05-14 3:38 PM, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
> Hi Felix
>
> I can resubmit this without those, but I wont be able to test it for a couple
> of days and would prefer to wait until I have tested it, is that OK?
Sure. You can make things easier to follow by submitting your changes as
a series using
Hi Felix
I can resubmit this without those, but I wont be able to test it for a couple
of days and would prefer to wait until I have tested it, is that OK?
thanks for the feedback
--Andrew
On 14/05/13 22:56, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2013-05-14 3:13 PM, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>
On 2013-05-14 3:13 PM, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> Sorry, I'm still learning how this project works ... I have been trying to
> follow the patch submission checklist as best I can.
>
> Perhaps that adivce could be added to the guidelines on
> https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPat
Hi Felix,
Sorry, I'm still learning how this project works ... I have been trying to
follow the patch submission checklist as best I can.
Perhaps that adivce could be added to the guidelines on
https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches page, but I only worked out how
to get edit access to ot
On 2013-05-14 2:44 PM, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
>
> This patch adds a kernel target for the D-Link DIR-632-A1.
>
> Note that the CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I2 and BANK changes are duplicated from DD-WRT
> and the D-Link firmware; I think it is because this uses a different flash
> chip (mx25l6405d) from many
This patch adds a kernel target for the D-Link DIR-632-A1.
Note that the CONFIG_MTD_CFI_I2 and BANK changes are duplicated from DD-WRT
and the D-Link firmware; I think it is because this uses a different flash
chip (mx25l6405d) from many of the other similar devices.
Signed-off-by: Andrew McDonn
