Hello George.
No, unfortunatelly it doesn't. I was trying to get a more objective
reply from perhaps whoever built and maintains this router profile in
order to understand and compare when using original firmware and OpenWrt
customized to it. All around the performance X feature list.
As the w
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Fernando Frediani
wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity. Dp these builds of OpenWrt for Mikrotik RBs make usage
of any possible hardware off-loads or config customizations are CPU
affinity possibility made by Mikrotik themselves in their original RouterOS
?
Does this help t
Out of curiosity. Dp these builds of OpenWrt for Mikrotik RBs make usage
of any possible hardware off-loads or config customizations are CPU
affinity possibility made by Mikrotik themselves in their original
RouterOS ?
Thanks
Fernando
On 15/10/2015 14:48, George Chriss wrote:
On Thu, April
On Thu, April 23, 2015 06:16:08 CEST, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> This mail thread seem to have gone dark since december with seemingly
> no conclusion.
>
> I have tried to collect the experiences reported on the wiki page:
>
> wiki.openwrt.org/toh/mikrotik/rb2011uias
>
> As you can see from the table
This mail thread seem to have gone dark since december with seemingly
no conclusion.
I have tried to collect the experiences reported on the wiki page:
wiki.openwrt.org/toh/mikrotik/rb2011uias
As you can see from the table, for me it only works with 0x6f.
Chris, for whom both 0x3e and 0x6f work
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 09:35:26PM -0500, Soren Harward wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> > While I'm here, how do I build a sysupgrade.bin image? I'm getting
> > tired of doing bootp/tftp installs!
>
> AFAIK, MikroTik's don't have a sysupgrade path, probably becau
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> While I'm here, how do I build a sysupgrade.bin image? I'm getting
> tired of doing bootp/tftp installs!
AFAIK, MikroTik's don't have a sysupgrade path, probably because of
strong variability in flash layout among the dozens of RouterBoard/
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 09:40:07AM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 10:51:11PM -0500, Soren Harward wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Soren Harward wrote:
> > > I'm attaching my dmesg just in case someone who understands the boot
> > > process of these devices better t
On Thu, Jan 01, 2015 at 10:51:11PM -0500, Soren Harward wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Soren Harward wrote:
> > I'm attaching my dmesg just in case someone who understands the boot
> > process of these devices better than I do can maybe figure out what
> > the difference is between my [
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Soren Harward wrote:
> I'm attaching my dmesg just in case someone who understands the boot
> process of these devices better than I do can maybe figure out what
> the difference is between my [working] machine and everyone else's
> [non-working] machines.
Actuall
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Soren Harward wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Chris Green wrote:
>> This patch is the same as the Routerboard 951G fix, I've built this
>> and tested it on my rb-2011uias-2hnd. However we should check that it
>> also works on other/older RB2011 routers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 03:25:57PM -0500, Matt Lee wrote:
>Hi David,
>
>I tested on 2011UiAS-2HnD and 2011UAS-2HnD, and for me, this works
>better with pll_1000 set to 0x6f00. But I have to make more
>testing.
>
>I will conitnue testing...
>
>Thanks
>
I'm still list
Hi David,
I tested on 2011UiAS-2HnD and 2011UAS-2HnD, and for me, this works better
with pll_1000 set to 0x6f00. But I have to make more testing.
I will conitnue testing...
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:57 PM, David Hutchison
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you try: ath79_eth0_pll_data.pl
Hello,
Can you try: ath79_eth0_pll_data.pll_1000 = 0x6f000;
This is the value I originally found on the 951G, I tried to toggle as
many bits as possible and narrow down from there. John Crispin found
some documentation and we narrowed it down to 0x3e00 for the 951G.
He is actually working
Hi Chris,
>This patch is the same as the Routerboard 951G fix, I've built this
>and tested it on my rb-2011uias-2hnd. However we should check that it
>also works on other/older RB2011 routers which did work OK with the
>unpatched code.
>
>diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mac
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Chris Green wrote:
> This patch is the same as the Routerboard 951G fix, I've built this
> and tested it on my rb-2011uias-2hnd. However we should check that it
> also works on other/older RB2011 routers which did work OK with the
> unpatched code.
I'll do that s
This patch is the same as the Routerboard 951G fix, I've built this
and tested it on my rb-2011uias-2hnd. However we should check that it
also works on other/older RB2011 routers which did work OK with the
unpatched code.
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-rb2011.c
b/targ
17 matches
Mail list logo
