Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH/RFC] Check for openssl development headers during prereq

2014-05-20 Thread Florian Fainelli
2014-05-20 6:02 GMT-07:00 Michael Heimpold : > Hi Florian, > > >> >> Should we build a host version of OpenSSL (or LibreSSL now?) which has >> evp enabled instead and link u-boot mkimage against it? >> > > this would be another approach. > > I see the following... > > Pros: > - fewer deps to the ho

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH/RFC] Check for openssl development headers during prereq

2014-05-20 Thread Michael Heimpold
Hi Florian, Should we build a host version of OpenSSL (or LibreSSL now?) which has evp enabled instead and link u-boot mkimage against it? this would be another approach. I see the following... Pros: - fewer deps to the host system - full control of the version and library used (openssl vs

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH/RFC] Check for openssl development headers during prereq

2014-05-19 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hi Michael, 2014-05-17 12:08 GMT-07:00 Michael Heimpold : > Some host tools needs the host openssl headers in place, e.g. > U-Boot's mkimage. We could try to make this check configuration > dependent but I think it's not worth it. > Also the check might be smarter - but it just works :-) Should w

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH/RFC] Check for openssl development headers during prereq

2014-05-17 Thread Michael Heimpold
Some host tools needs the host openssl headers in place, e.g. U-Boot's mkimage. We could try to make this check configuration dependent but I think it's not worth it. Also the check might be smarter - but it just works :-) Signed-off-by: Michael Heimpold --- include/prereq-build.mk |9 ++