On 04/03/11 12:42, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 11:05:02 +0100, Mark Vels
> wrote:
>
>
>>> in my opinion is that the developers community of OpenWRT has no
>>> interest in keeping a tagged packages tree.
>
> Right
Did you forget the tags here?
On 03/02/2011 05:39 PM, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:
The source tree is tagged. LuCI is tagged. But "packages" apparently isn't.
this thing of having packages feed tagged comes back from time to time.
in my opinion is that the developers community of OpenWRT has no
interest in keeping a tagg
Changeset 25113 bumped the version of package ntfs-3g to 2011.1.15 but the
checksum for that blob is erroneously called
PKG_MD5SUM_2010.1.15.
This patch provides a fix for this typo.
Index: utils/ntfs-3g/Makefile
===
--- utils/ntfs-3
> exact, thats the point: review. and make it better, if possible - so here is
> the patch...
Too bad you don't want to try to look at it from my point of view.
This patch is not an improvement. It should be rejected.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
op
On 19/01/11 14:24, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
>> Did you test it with the other 'selectable' shells as well?
> only with dash/bash and ash,
> but these commands are very simple and are
> working on every somehow organzied posix-shell.
Sed will return the same output, regardless what shell you use.
>> I
Hi Bastian,
On 19/01/11 08:58, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> it is always a bad idea to mix up different languages
> in one environment.
But IMHO it's a good thing to use proven tools that are designed to do
precisely that.
> now we use ash-builtins to get
> uptime_in_seconds() instead of using crypt
On 05/12/10 15:36, Marcus Osdoba wrote:
> Hello mailinglist,
>
> I'm compiling kirkwood images for my dockstar out of the current trunk
> (r24217). Everything seems to work fine. Jffs2 is expanding and the
> system tries to enter init process.
>
> Unfortunatly I get the following error message an
previously posted
with subject:
[PATCH] Fix typo in name of to be included file
Signed-off-by: Mark Vels
---
package/block-mount/files/fsck.sh |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/block-mount/files/fsck.sh
b/package/block-mount/files/fsck.sh
On 16/11/10 23:40, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> Can we add something like
>> [ -d /lib/functions/fsck ] && pi_include /lib/functions/fsck
>
> A more logical place would be the pi_include() procedure.
> It should be changed to handle not existing firs garcefully.
>
> ~ Jow
pi_include()
On 13/11/10 12:33, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:29:08 +0100
> mark.v...@team-embedded.nl wrote:
>
>> From: Mark Vels
>>
>> This typo fix solves at least the following warning:
>> sysinit: WARNING: /lib/functions/fsck not found
>> bu
From: Mark Vels
This typo fix solves at least the following warning:
sysinit: WARNING: /lib/functions/fsck not found
but probably also some functionality that uses the functions
from this include file.
Signed-off-by: Mark Vels
---
package/block-mount/files/fsck.sh |2 +-
1 files
On 21/07/10 23:06, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> The user that builds its own firmware from scratch either knowns which
>> packages are free or he/she does not care.
>>
> How would a user (who cares) know which package is Free and which isn't?
> I'm fairly well versed in those matters, and yet, eve
the command line.
Reported-by: Nathan Huizinga
Signed-off-by: Mark Vels
---
Index: package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/boot
===
--- package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/boot(revision 21889)
+++ package/base-files/files/etc/init.d
>
>> Also, what are the steps for using external feeds? I saw the help that
>> "scripts/feeds" gives, but wanted more detailed info than that.
>> For instance, how to cleanup or back out an external feed that I decide
>> I don't want, or again putting things back into the "pristine" state above.
.
Signed-off-by: Mark Vels
diff --git a/toolchain/gcc/Makefile b/toolchain/gcc/Makefile
index 8b92060..679fd31 100644
--- a/toolchain/gcc/Makefile
+++ b/toolchain/gcc/Makefile
@@ -116,11 +116,6 @@ else
--disable-libssp
endif
-ifeq ($(CONFIG_TLS_SUPPORT),)
- GCC_CONFIGURE+= \
- --disable
Hi,
Just a short question out of curiosity: is there a reason why package
uboot-ifxmips is in package/ instead of target/linux/ifxmips/image/ like
on most other platforms?
Thanks,
Mark
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
ht
Please find attached a small patch to pinpoint misconfiguration to user in the
case where CONFIG_EXTRA_TARGET_ARCH is set but CONFIG_EXTRA_TARGET_ARCH_NAME is
not.
Signed-off-by: Mark Vels
---
toolchain/binutils/Makefile |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
17 matches
Mail list logo
