which uClibc version are currently used?
if i interpret toolchain/uClibc/Makefile correctly only
0.9.30-git
0.9.30.1
0.9.30.2
0.9.30.3
is this correct or are there still older version used elsewhere?
thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-d
find attached the announced patch for fuse.
changes:
- latest fuse 2.8.3
- includes now the kernel module for kernel 2.4
- builds parallel
- fuse-utils includes now ulockmgr_server
fuse24 should be deleted from trunk.
bud
Index: package/fuse/patches/102-no_depmod.patch
===
i have an update for fuse in the pipeline. it will obsolete fuse24 and
bump fuse to the latest version. it should build fine parallel. but who
knows, could you please doublecheck as soon as i posted it?
therefor i unfortunately also ask to suppend the fuse and fuse24 patches.
thanks bud
On 08.03
in my post for testers some people answered. Maybe somebody volunteers
if you ask there or post a topic yourself?
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=100795
bud
On 20.02.2010 20:25, Spudz76 wrote:
> I am also still working on the expanded version, as time permits, to
> support older cor
>
> The patch attached to that ticket is for 2.0.2, please attach a patch for
> 2.0.3.
>
> Thanks
> Travis
sorry for the confusion, actually i modified 2.0.1 into 2.0.2 ..
obviously the original author also released an updated version in
between. i was in contact with him and understood he woul
hi jow,
i just had time to double check the code you checked in. unfortunately
you inserted the old version 2.0.2 from the originating web space.
people will have problems with that version.
please remove the Makefile and take the patch on
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6343
to add the package.
On 15.02.2010 17:58, Raphaël HUCK wrote:
> +MAKE_ARGS += CCOPT="$(TARGET_CFLAGS)"
>
> define Build/Compile/libupnp-sample
> $(MAKE) -C $(PKG_BUILD_DIR) \
> - CCOPT="$(TARGET_CFLAGS)" \
> DESTDIR="$(PKG_INSTALL_DIR)" \
> check
> + $(MAKE) -C $(PKG
> are you referring to this ticket?
>
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6577
>
>
yes in connection to
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2010-January/005722.html
> Yeah in fact the right way to do it is MAKE_FLAGS:
>
> MAKE_FLAGS += CFLAGS_O="$(TARGET_CFLAGS)"
>
nope,
while testing I found that the holplug.d/block scripts are not called
for usbstorage devices on brcm-2.4 .. instead usb is called with just a
few parameters, missing essentials like devicepath or such necessary for
automount.
is there a solution except from /sbin/usbstorage that is able to deal
cl
> I use hotplugged swap. It is not a bad idea per se, as long as the
> administrator knows that the device can not be removed while the system is
> running. The reason I use hotplug in particular is that the USB subsystem
> is not initialized until after the fstab init script is run.
or swapoff i
Hi Raphael,
in connection to this patch I doublechecked and modified my latest
ntfs-3g update (we obviously had the same idea ;) and found this
>
> MAKE_ARGS += CFLAGS_O="$(TARGET_CFLAGS)"
>
is obviously ignored. To have it in the make call one can do it the
broadcom-wl package way
MAKE := $(
What do I have to do to get these updated packages into the stable
kamikaze branch? Fuse on brcm-2.4 and brcm-47xx is broken without the
DCACHE BUG patch in trunk.
thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.op
I want to split this into 3 scripts.
10-mount
11-mount_ntfs-3g
20-mount_swap
the ntfs-3g and swap script will be part of the corresponding packages
(swap-utils,ntfs-3g), hence will not be there if the package is not
installed. All scripts check if a device was already mounted before.
Swap comes
the attached patch bumps ntfs-3g to the latest version. menuconfig
integration has been slightly modified. Also new:
- package ntfs-3g now also contains the ntfs-3g.probe binary
- new subpackage called ntfs-3g-utils contains ntfs-3g.{usermap,secaudit}
Tested on brcm-2.4 and brcm-47xx.
.. bud
Inde
Well, I extensively tested mmc mod for broadcom platform because I
figured it to be the cheapest way to have more space on a openwrt
router, namely the wrt54gl. Eventually I think usb is now the way to go.
My tests for the sdmodded wrt54gl resulted in
brcm-2.4 - broadcom-mmc, mmc 1.3.5 from for
Thanks a lot. What about the open actions list.. any comments?
Regarding testers: I will put a request/announcement in the forum as
soon the module is in the trunk. I myself am using it for months now and
discovered no problems.
bud
On 16.01.2010 15:19, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
Just a reminder. As usual :'(
see bottom of the message
I understand you guys are busy, but the lack of feedback in the list can
be frustrating to contributors. It definitely is sometimes for me ;)
Is there a list of open patches? Wouldn't it make sense to have one
listed by priority, by whic
it doesn't .. actually it is installed by opkg as it should be with 644
.. my friday bug, see attachment .. thanks
btw. I am right now updating ntfs-3g and fuse .. if everything goes well
I'll send them next week.
bud
On 18.12.2009 22:00, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSA
the brcm-2.4 sdhc driver is also still pending
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6343
.. thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
As announced the new package broadcom-sdhc. I created a enhancement
ticket here
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6343
Please add it to trunk and remove broadcom-mmc, which is then obsolete.
Thanks bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.op
The way I do it do use the same basic boot method as for a flash
filesystem, and just do the necessary things to make up for the
differences between to two types of media. I can do that because I
have modularized the preinit/mount_root/firstboot scripts and subsitute
usb boot stuff where approp
I just recently found an updated sdhc kernel module based upon the
optimized mmc 1.3.5 from the forum.
http://4mul8.ca/openwrt/source/broadcom-sdhc-2.0.1/
I tried it and it is again faster and supposedly to support sdhc cards,
which I don't own, therefor can't check. Unfortunately it is for kern
I've refreshed the patches to work with current trunk (as the old
patches were no longer applying cleanly due to recent changes). There
are also a couple of minor functional changes some of which make the
usb root stuff I'm working on easier.
Do you plan to overlay the internal flash?
I act
nslookup openwrt.org 208.67.222.222
Server: resolver1.opendns.com
Address: 208.67.222.222
Name:openwrt.org
Address: 78.24.191.177
regards .. bud
On 23.08.2009 10:36, MichelinoK wrote:
i have the same problem...they've changed the ip of openwrt.org so we have
to wait for the DNS arou
No it doesn't .. it's probably the old dns entry still cached in your
(providers) dns system ...
You can use opendns to to workaround ... bud
On 23.08.2009 19:06, Daniel Lenski wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:14:54 +0200, ulf kypke wrote:
hi http://downloads.openwrt.org/ is sending an empty pa
added opendns servers now to kamikaze 7.09 on my router, following this
directions
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=12408
here the steps in case you can't access forum.openwrt.org
edit /etc/rc.d/S60dnsmasq
add the following to DNS_SERVERS=""
DNS_SERVERS="208.67.222.222 208.67.220.22
would have been nice .. also maybe a little note beforehand to the list
... anyway for now I added a
http://www.opendns.com/
server manually before the router in lan connections dns settings.
Anybody knows the value of the dns ttl? Or how long until I can remove
the alternative server again?
getting timeouts, anybody else experiencing this?
..bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
I run into this
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=13134
everytime I checkout trunk new.
It is mentioned that the value could be given as parameter in the forum
thread. Also I could imagine patching trx.c . Currently it's hardcoded
to 0x5A ... The wl500w has 8MB flash, so I assume 0
I am in for that. I want to use an sd-modded wrt54gl and a usbsticked
wl500w this way.
Therefore I'd also like to put the optimized mmc module for kernel2.4 in
the trunk. Any opinions? Should we keep the old and setup a
kmod-broadcom-mmc2 or replace the old one (which doesn't work with my
set
Hi all,
I am having a hard time to find the place where mounting root "/" really
happens ..
http://oldwiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs%282f%29OpenWrtDocs%282f%29lKamikazeBootHowTo.html
is not helpful
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=10816
seems to be out of date.
I added comments to /sbin
is there a reason why the
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=9653
is not in the buildroot?
From my tests it is faster and more compatible than the current
'package/broadcom-mmc'.
... bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.open
... the patch is attached to the ticket
https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/5584
The package didn't build because it failed to build the obsolete fuse
module of the package. The patch disables the module building and
updates the Makefile comments accordingly.
.. thanks bud
___
I'll change that and send the patch next week to the list.
... bud
bud.d...@suisse.org wrote:
Are you sure that it compiles with< 2.6.27 ? Did you try?
no :-)
i was only conservative and thought that it just broke recently.
Maybe it's time to disable the module by default without condit
just out of interest.
I see options in menuconfig to change the gcc version and others but ís
the used kernel version configurable?
thx bud
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/open
Are you sure that it compiles with < 2.6.27 ? Did you try?
It would make sense to remove the currently commented out condition
alltogether. (By the way I read that it says every kernel < 2.6.25
works). But this is a remainder from before I worked on this package.
#ifeq ($(strip $(call
Compar
Some of them are well documented differences, you can look to the
Autoconf manual. It has had to handle them to become a really
multiplatform tool.
See for example:
http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/Limitations-of-Builtins.html#index-g_t_0040command_007btest_007d-1431
rea
Thanks for pointing out ... bud
Hi,
Since changesets 16606 and 16607 we have switched to using software floating
point emulation in the toolchain and we disabled the in-kernel FPU Emulator
in the MIPS kernel by default.
The rationale behind this is :
- the FPU emulator of the kernel is slow an
On 18.06.2009 18:00, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2009 16:22:54 Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
today I've written a proof-of-concept for
getting rid of oldstyle networking aka 'ifconfig'.
You do realize that this "oldstyle" networking stuff uses busybox
internals while switchi
I eventually reverse engineered myself through the buildroot Makefiles
and came up with the following solution.
define KernelPackage/fuse24/install
$(call $(Package/kmod-fuse24/install))
echo mknod /dev/fuse -m 0666 c 10 229 >> $(1)/CONTROL/postinst
endef
I could find another de
on kernel 2.4 with the fuse 2.5.3 kernel module it isn't ... I'll
doublecheck with kernel 2.6 fuse 2.7.4 tonight ... bud
Le Thursday 04 June 2009 17:23:20 bud.d...@suisse.org, vous avez écrit :
I currently play around with sshfs and it was missing the kernel fuse
module (so it said). In reali
I currently play around with sshfs and it was missing the kernel fuse
module (so it said). In reality the /dev/fuse character device was missing.
Now I need a clue on how to modify the package Makefile to create
/dev/fuse either on package installation or earlier and package it with
the ipkg a
Hi all,
I've got two questions.
I am working with an Asus wl500w and want to set up a profile for the
buildroot. I see the readymade images after the buildroot make in 'bin'.
What I want is to define a profile for this router, so that all needed
packages are automatically in a special wl500w
43 matches
Mail list logo
