Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH V2] ar71xx: support for kernel 3.1

2012-01-18 Thread OutbackDingo
On Jan 18, 2012, at 2:47 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Otto Solares Cabrera wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:57:46PM +0100, Hartmut Knaack wrote: >>> juhosg was working quite hard to get us out of sync, with decent support of >>> nbd ;-) It took me a while, but we'

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-16 Thread OutBackDingo
ster, the other more flexible. im surprised theres no python gui, or php even. people want functionality and features without giving up performance. On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:10 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 20:59 +0700, OutBackDingo wrote: > > Its funny you all

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Gargoyle -- another (new) web interface for OpenWrt Kamikaze

2008-07-16 Thread OutBackDingo
Its funny you all speak about division, being i cant completely functionally use any of them that exists, being x-wrt, gargoyle, or luci so to each there own, there is CoovaAP also which is a diversion gargoyle doesnt even configure WDS from where i can see, looking at Luci next, x-wrt leaves a bi