Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Size of .trx files is "off by 4kB"

2009-02-16 Thread Oliver Jowett
Stefan Monnier wrote: > Interesting. So that would mean that as long as I don't actually use > a jffs partition, I can just strip off the last 4kB excess? I guess so (the startup scripts may need some mangling too as they'll be expecting a jffs filesystem there by default IIRC), but if you don'

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Size of .trx files is "off by 4kB"

2009-02-16 Thread Oliver Jowett
Stefan Monnier wrote: > Ping? Doesn't someone have some idea of where that might come from? I'm not familiar with .trx in particular, but at least for AR7 squashfs images there is a 4-byte jffs marker at the very end that is deliberately aligned to the start of the next erase block after the end

[OpenWrt-Devel] #4522 and mtu_fix - what is the performance cost of mtu_fix?

2009-01-30 Thread Oliver Jowett
Hi In the course of commenting on #4522 I decreased the MTU on my DSL connection while keeping mtu_fix disabled. Since I have a non-broken ISP this shouldn't, in theory, be an issue. However I now have 6 or so iptables rules applying TCPMSS PMTU clamping to random broken netblocks - including, no

[OpenWrt-Devel] #2781 needs reopening

2009-01-28 Thread Oliver Jowett
Can someone with access reopen https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/2781 please? Thanks. -O ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org http://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Why does AR7 pad the image before appending squashfs?

2009-01-24 Thread Oliver Jowett
Hi AR7 squashfs images (built in target/linux/ar7/image/Makefile) pad the kernel image to a 64k boundary before appending the squashfs image. Is this deliberate? It looks like it may have been introduced accidentally in this commit: > -