Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] remount /dev/root readonly for shutdown

2010-02-01 Thread Gerlando Falauto
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Don't use XFS ! I WON'Tt. I promise. Definitely NOT for root filesystem. > Different versions of the XFS driver are not compatibles. > It seems that the version you have in your kernel is different from the > version used by LaCie. So w

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] remount /dev/root readonly for shutdown

2010-01-31 Thread Gerlando Falauto
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:29 PM, puchu wrote: > Hi, > > i use xfs but on my linux desktop system (not openwrt) ... there it works > nice. > the only thing i know is that xfs needs more ram then ext2/3 and on systems > with low ram profile it > can get very unreliable and unstable. Well it's 64M

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] remount /dev/root readonly for shutdown

2010-01-31 Thread Gerlando Falauto
> I tried switching to ext2, but now I can't even boot at all: > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) on device 8:2. > Freeing init memory: 116K > Please be patient, while OpenWrt loads ... > > Maybe I screwed up something in my backup / mkfs / restore process... > tomorrow I'll try with a fresh o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] remount /dev/root readonly for shutdown

2010-01-30 Thread Gerlando Falauto
t; >>           /sbin/reboot >> >>           /etc/init.d/sshd stop >> >>           exit >> >>         } >> >> >> >> poweroff() { romount > /dev/null 2>&1 >> >>             /sbin/poweroff >> >>        

[OpenWrt-Devel] remount /dev/root readonly for shutdown

2010-01-29 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Hi all, I am (slowly) experimenting with my LaCie Ethernet Disk Mini v2 NAS. In order to maintain compatibility with Lacie's software, I did not change the disk layout (yet). I can run my own OpenWRT without disrupting the original firmware by putting the kernel's uImage on [sda9]/snaps/00/boot an

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [openwrt-devel-ow...@lists.openwrt.org: ***SPAM*** Re: [lacie-nas] support for Lacie devices (e.g. edmini_v2)]

2010-01-17 Thread Gerlando Falauto
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Simon Guinot wrote: > Actually, the lacie-nas project is more concerned to provide mainline > kernel support for the Orion and Kirkwood based LaCie NAS. What do you mean by that? Kernel developments are more related to the lacie-nas project than openwrt? > The G

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] support for Lacie devices (e.g. edmini_v2)

2010-01-15 Thread Gerlando Falauto
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:28:04 +0100 > From: Thomas Monjalon > To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > Cc: lacie-...@sequanux.org, Gerlando Falauto >         > It could be part of the effort of the project lacie-nas.org. If you plan to do > some documentation, I think you s

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] support for Lacie devices (e.g. edmini_v2) (Jose Vasconcellos)

2010-01-15 Thread Gerlando Falauto
> From: Jose Vasconcellos > To: OpenWrt Development List > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] support for Lacie devices (e.g. >        edmini_v2) > > Hi  Gerlando, > > I have one of these devices and every once in a while when it crashes > I think I should put OpenWrt on it! Just haven't had the time.

[OpenWrt-Devel] support for Lacie devices (e.g. edmini_v2)

2010-01-13 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Hi everybody, is there any plan or ongoing activity to support (and to what extent) LaCie NAS devices? I'm talking about the family of Ethernet-aware hard drives based on Marvell Orion/Feroceon chipsets, namely: d2 Network, Ethernet Disk Mini v2, 2big, 5big, Ethernet Big Disk. I noticed the trunk