On 2019-01-30 5:51 a.m., Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please share the exact steps used to trigger the issue. Running a simple
> "make" after an initial build here does not trigger the recompilation of
> uci or the kernel.
>
> ~ Jo
>
And environment (OS, distro, version) please!
Regards,
Dani
On 2019-01-07 4:57 p.m., Marcel Telka wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 03:54:52AM -0500, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
>> On 2019-01-04 2:14 a.m., Marcel Telka wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After upgrade from LEDE 17.01.4 to OpenWrt 18.06.1 I noticed that
>>>
On 2019-01-07 8:49 p.m., Daniel Santos wrote:
> This is is mostly for those who've wanted something like this. It still
> needs cleanup.
>
> This patch enables OpenWRT to re-construct a kernel git tree instead of
> just extracting and patching the kernel sources to an essentially
> temporary direc
On 2019-01-09 7:45 a.m., Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> personally I rarely visit Github PRs these days, any discussions going
> on there (in issues or PRs) will likely get overlooked by most devs.
>
> ~
Thanks. That's kind of what I thought. I don't suppose there is any
chance of having a sm
On 2019-01-07 4:03 a.m., Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 08:46:25PM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
>> Daniel Golle [2019-01-01 17:56:25]:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:26:58AM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
Daniel Golle [2018-12-29 06:51:32]:
> config KERNEL_AIO
On 2019-01-03 2:21 a.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> On 2019-01-02 8:58 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
>> On 2019-01-02 3:06 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With the SDK I'm getting errors with LTO -- at least for json-c LD is
>
On 2018-12-29 12:51 a.m., Daniel Golle wrote:
> enable kernel features needed for procd-ujail, procd-seccomp, lxc and
> lvm2 on devices with big enough flash. Those packages are currently
> useless in binary builds due to missing kernel features.
> Enable the features on devices which can bare with
On 2019-01-05 3:54 a.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> On 2019-01-04 2:14 a.m., Marcel Telka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After upgrade from LEDE 17.01.4 to OpenWrt 18.06.1 I noticed that
>> mailq from
>> the msmtpq-ng-mta package no longer works:
>>
> So I have
On 2019-01-04 2:14 a.m., Marcel Telka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrade from LEDE 17.01.4 to OpenWrt 18.06.1 I noticed that
> mailq from
> the msmtpq-ng-mta package no longer works:
>
So I have bad news -- I'm upstream and I deprecated / abandoned the
msmtpq-ng as a bad idea. I could probably be conv
Sorry for dup sent from wrong address and expected a bounce but it got
accepted.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
So I got 'yelled at'[0] for saying "Would you be willing to send this or
something based on it to the openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org list?
That's the best place to discuss distro wide stuff like this.
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel I'm glad
someone is taking this up!" i
So I got 'yelled at'[0] for saying "Would you be willing to send this or
something based on it to the openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org list?
That's the best place to discuss distro wide stuff like this.
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel I'm glad
someone is taking this up!" i
On 2019-01-02 8:58 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> On 2019-01-02 3:06 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With the SDK I'm getting errors with LTO -- at least for json-c LD is
>> trying to load the *target's* LTO plugin instead of host.
>>
On 2019-01-02 3:06 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the SDK I'm getting errors with LTO -- at least for json-c LD is
> trying to load the *target's* LTO plugin instead of host.
>
> 7.4.0_musl_eabi/bin/../libexec/gcc/arm-openwrt-linux-muslgnueabi/7.4
On 2019-01-02 3:06 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the SDK I'm getting errors with LTO -- at least for json-c LD is
> trying to load the *target's* LTO plugin instead of host.
>
For reference the error in the previous maili is *in* the SDK. Same
p
Hi,
With the SDK I'm getting errors with LTO -- at least for json-c LD is
trying to load the *target's* LTO plugin instead of host.
Not sure where to start looking for this.
Some relevant config:
'like buildbot'
when building SDK: all packages and kernel mods and target specific
packages.
Is L
Hi,
Just wondering if there are snapshots built for the backports etc done
onto the 18.06 tree (e.g. in preparation for 18.06.2), or after release
are there only adhoc builds for release candidates for the point release?
If there are snapshots could the link be added to
https://downloads.ope
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it's possible to enable builds of initramfs (in
addition to the main sysupgrade images) by default for PowerCloud CR5000
(and possibly CAP324, but see note) and CR3000.
Previously one had to add a serial header to get these away from stock,
but I've poked away and di
On 2018-12-10 8:59 p.m., Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not sure what's changed but the PowerCloud CR5000 DTS for ath79 no
longer works for 5GHz wireless (everything else does though). It
worked for ar71xx in 18.06.1 (have not yet tried ar71xx in master).
So a few detail
Hi all,
I'm not sure what's changed but the PowerCloud CR5000 DTS for ath79 no
longer works for 5GHz wireless (everything else does though). It worked
for ar71xx in 18.06.1 (have not yet tried ar71xx in master).
It tried some changes discussed on
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1613
On 2018-09-14 11:18 a.m., Karl Palsson wrote:
"Daniel F. Dickinson" wrote:
Hi,
This isn't my first preference, but I think this is becoming a
bit of a problem, especially for people not all that familiar
with who's who in OpenWrt.
I've noticed that community (vs.
On 2018-09-13 1:12 p.m., Lech Perczak wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Answers inline.
Thanks but for *policy* questions I prefer answers from voting
committers like Mathias Kresin (who has been working on herding ath79).
W dniu 2018-09-12 o 04:24, Daniel F. Dickinson pisze:
Hi,
I'm having tr
Hi,
This isn't my first preference, but I think this is becoming a bit of a
problem, especially for people not all that familiar with who's who in
OpenWrt.
I've noticed that community (vs. voting committers) often jump in with
(presumably well-meant) advice that might not actually match what
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding a concise summary of what is the policy for
using multiple leds for boot/failsafe, etc status (in this case updating
CAP324 to use both colours of the 'power' led, now that such logic in in
ath79 tree).
Also are leds supposed to be named according to manufactur
Hi all,
For /etc/hotplug.json is it possible to include another .json file
conditionally (that is if /etc/hotplug.json.d/30-nut-usbhid-ups.json
exists, include it)?
Regards,
Daniel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https:
On 2018-08-13 06:19 AM, Karl Palsson wrote:
> "Daniel F. Dickinson" wrote:
>> Posting on list as I think the discussion should include as
>> folks as possible in the discussion.
>>
>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6745
>>
>>>
On 2018-08-19 03:09 PM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> Since it's holiday season I will wait until after first full week of
> September to close https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6748 which
> discusses this issue.
>
> I would like to say that impatience (and I'm
On 2018-08-13 06:19 AM, Karl Palsson wrote:
> "Daniel F. Dickinson" wrote:
>> Posting on list as I think the discussion should include as
>> folks as possible in the discussion.
>>
>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6745
>>
>>>
Since it's holiday season I will wait until after first full week of
September to close https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6748 which
discusses this issue.
I would like to say that impatience (and I'm badly guilty of this too),
is a big part of the problem here and with the perceived
maint
On 2018-08-19 12:30 PM, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> 08/19/2018 05:46 PM, Chuanhong Guo:
>> Another difference there is that eth0 and eth1 are swapped for chips
>> with builtin switch (except ar7240). And I think this one makes it
>> really annoying to write a config migration script.
>
> Indeed, it wil
On 2018-08-13 01:45 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 2:45 AM Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> personally I'm opposed to the entire code load thing.
>>
>> First of all I was unable to reproduce the tarballs offered by Github.
>>
>> Github seems to use an extended tar (pax) format
On 2018-08-13 01:45 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
>> Furthermore I dislike the idea of tailoring download mechanisms around a
>> specific proprietary service.
This I agree with
>>
>> If the allegations about hash changes for unknown reasons are correct,
>> then this raises a huge red flag for me
> I ca
On 2018-08-13 06:19 AM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> "Daniel F. Dickinson" wrote:
>> Posting on list as I think the discussion should include as
>> folks as possible in the discussion.
>>
>> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6745
>>
>>&g
Posting here as this seems to me to be a project decision:
From: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6748
> @neheb Has submitted a number of PR's (referenced in #6584), full list of
> his/her PR's (which probably include the codeload thing for any github
> pulls): https://github.com/op
Posting on list as I think the discussion should include as folks as
possible in the discussion.
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/6745
> Especially when getting started with OpenWrt finding things in menuconfig is
> complicated by the second level menus that are sometimes used and some
On 2018-08-06 10:21 AM, David Bauer wrote:
> This adds uci entries for all ath79 devices for which this already was
> the case on ar71xx. Additionally we add the OCEDO Koala as there was no
> support in OpenWRT yet.
Can you rebase (and add boards added since the commit this is based on)
against la
On 2018-08-02 01:59 AM, Hannu Nyman wrote:
> Daniel F. Dickinson wrote at Wed Aug 1 14:17:41 PDT 2018:
>
>> Is this reported to do nasty things *without* debugging?
>
>
> Daniel,
>
> I compiled for WNDR3800 and your commits totally broke the
> switch/interface
Looking further. WNDR has a RTL switch right?
On 2018-08-01 04:34 PM, LEDE Commits wrote:
> jow pushed a commit to openwrt/openwrt.git, branch master:
> https://git.lede-project.org/b9bd3285c7c6fbc60374b05ac2da9be41ce75651
>
> commit b9bd3285c7c6fbc60374b05ac2da9be41ce75651
> Author: Jo-Phil
Hi Jo,
Re:
On 2018-08-01 04:34 PM, LEDE Commits wrote:
> jow pushed a commit to openwrt/openwrt.git, branch master:
> https://git.lede-project.org/33dbe2c55da1480559092185c4ef071995d9bc90
>
> commit 33dbe2c55da1480559092185c4ef071995d9bc90
> Author: Jo-Philipp Wich
> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 1 22:31
On 2018-07-30 04:09 AM, Thibaut wrote:
>
>
>> Le 30 juil. 2018 à 08:40, John Crispin a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29/07/18 11:07, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote:
>>> This patch improves 5684d087418d176cfdef4e045e1950ca7ba3b09f by correcting
>>> the partition scheme for the "RouterBoot" section of the flash.
>
On 2018-07-11 11:52 AM, Voina Alex wrote:
Dear OpenWRT/LEDE buddy,
I have found a bug in the Chaos Calmer (15.05.1 , 448532) release that
has been fixed since the lede-17.01.3 release for x86 targets. The bug
is related to ubusd or libubox but I'm not really sure which one it is.
It is a fi
On 2018-06-07 04:13 AM, Martin Schroeder wrote:
> How about you guys vote for a person. Make a list of candidates, mail
> it out to the list (people can add their own names if they wish). Then
> whoever gets voted in becomes the coordinator.
>
Hauke seems to be the coordinator (I've seen him occa
On 2018-05-26 05:17 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
"Daniel F. Dickinson" writes:
1) How many people have their own mail server and can do *server-side*
mail filtering
You do not need your own mail server to do server-side
filtering. Any mail service worth caring about will offer some s
On 2018-05-23 02:45 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 17:24 +0200, Torbjörn Jansson wrote:
PS: Remove this annoying tag '[OpenWrt-Devel]' from subject. XXI century in
the world - all email clients already know how filters messages based on
List-Id header.
Not everyone, plus led
Hi all,
For folks interested in both Openembedded and Openwrt you might be
interested to know that the meta-openwrt layer
(https://github.com/kraj/meta-openwrt) can now successfully bring up
enough to have
a cli + netifd and/or with base luci (depending on which image one
builds).
I think it
On 01/02/18 02:29 AM, Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
On 31/01/18 06:20 AM, Paul Oranje wrote:
Why use a hard coded value 4 in "snprintf(devnum, 4, "%d", vldev->id);" ?
Paul
Oh I see this also the uglier first throw-together; there is a v2 that
isn't as bad (and is
rst.
Regards,
Daniel
Op 30 jan. 2018, om 19:16 heeft csho...@thecshore.com het volgende geschreven:
From: "Daniel F. Dickinson"
Detected during a side project. Not a brilliant fix, but it
gets the job done for now. *very* lightly tested, more
for your information than anything els
On 30/01/18 01:16 PM, csho...@thecshore.com wrote:
From: "Daniel F. Dickinson"
Detected during a side project. Not a brilliant fix, but it
gets the job done for now. *very* lightly tested, more
for your information than anything else.
Dammit, made an off-by-one in the fixw
48 matches
Mail list logo
