ping! :)
bye
as
On 07/20/2011 12:32 PM, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
> I see, for some reason there is a patch backported from 2.6.38
> (77f431561ef97dda1d6e9a96da8d342046fbdba0), I am not sure why. I will
> see if I can remove as it is cosmetic only, but let me ask:
>
> as this pa
On 07/20/2011 10:35 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
>>> You should remove everything that not related to your target.
>>
>> As that kernel is developed for the "SPEAr" family of products it's not
>> easy (or maybe not even possible) to remove the features of a single
>> SoC... At minimum it's a very tedious
On 07/20/2011 12:16 AM, Imre Kaloz wrote:
> You should remove everything that not related to your target.
As that kernel is developed for the "SPEAr" family of products it's not
easy (or maybe not even possible) to remove the features of a single
SoC... At minimum it's a very tedious job. Besides
On 07/19/2011 08:27 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
> Other than wondering if it's upstreamed / upstream-able I'm really not
> qualified to speak about things like this for OpenWRT, so I'll defer
> this to someone else.
I get my kernel from:
http://git.stlinux.com/?p=spear/linux-2.6.git;a=summary
the
On 07/19/2011 01:55 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
> I just opened it up and the first thing that met my eyes were :
> -- really?
Eheeh sorry that was not meant to be included in the patch :)
I have *removed* that part from the patch. You can now download it again.
> I'm not qualified to speak fo
On 07/16/2011 12:27 PM, Alessio Sangalli wrote:
>> To better answer that question, you should put the patch somewhere, because
>> of
>> the mailing-list attachment size limitation. Then we can comment on your
>> patch
>> and tell you whether it's acceptable
On 07/16/2011 01:15 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello Alessio,
>
> On Saturday 16 July 2011 08:01:33 Alessio Sangalli wrote:
>> I have a couple of questions about porting a board to OpenWRT:
>>
>> 1) do you think it can be accepted in the main line OpenWRT git? It
>
I have a couple of questions about porting a board to OpenWRT:
1) do you think it can be accepted in the main line OpenWRT git? It
consists of a patch that is about 2MB when uncompressed as it adds all
the platform code to the kernel.
2) on top of that it requires a new Bootloader that I have the
Hi, I am using the UCI library in some of my programs. I understand that
UCI was born as a specific configuration for openwrt, but it could be
used for many different applications, not necessarily running on
openwrt. In particular, the "command line" uci tool is brilliant, I do
not know another
