I am not sure if I get a vote either, but +1. This is the penultimate
geek router.
I would love it if along the way the antenna design could be analyzed
(better beamforming at distance), and perhaps the rigorous set of
tests that candelatech does applied and published.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
We're on a mission to create a new
I also don't get a vote, but this sounds great.
Myself being in the market for some new Wifi 7 capable routers and a
replacement for my aging gateway. Would buy at least 4 of these in a
heartbeat. And I would be willing to wait for them if they are coming.
Personally I think this mix is gre
On 2/12/25 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
of OpenWrt "Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
* Tri-
Hi,
On 12.02.2025 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
of OpenWrt "Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
*
+1 on giving John Crispin permission to work with another company to produce a
"OpenWrt Two" ( that is, using the "OpenWrt" name)
Other people are considering using this device to do powerful things. What are
the projected RAM/Flash capacities? Thanks
Rich
> On Feb 12, 2025, at 1:44 PM, John C
On 2/12/25 7:44 PM, John Crispin wrote:
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of OpenWrt
"Two".
"Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following upgrades.
* MT7988
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
* Tri-band W
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 5:56 AM John Crispin wrote:
> long story short ... adding a hub and exposing 4 ports would cost 5$+
For a ~$250 device (even assuming a landed cost of around $120 or
so?), is that such a burden? Giving this system the best
expandability bang for the buck would seem to be
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
On 13/02/2025 08:47, John Crispi
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 04:06:50PM +0100, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 13.02.25 16:03, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
> > Very interesting.
> > Would also a SATA port be feasible ?
>
> the device will support ssd via pcie
I hope that, like on the OpenWrt One, the M.2 slot is going to be on the
top side
On 13.02.25 15:32, Tim Small wrote:
Is that the Realek RTL8251B ? If-so that supports MACsec offload I think
That is the PHY currently being considered.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mail
On 13.02.25 16:03, p...@oranjevos.nl wrote:
Very interesting.
Would also a SATA port be feasible ?
the device will support ssd via pcie
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/open
Op 12 feb 2025, om 19:44 heeft John Crispin het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development of
> OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copp
On 13.02.25 12:21, G10h4ck wrote:
Also at least a couple of plain USB port instead of just one would be
very nice improvement
Right now the plan is to have a single USB3 port. If we add multiple
ports we would require an internal HUB and those cost several dollars
plus the additional connect
+1
Is it possible to have a spare miniPCIe connector for an extra radio or
other kind of devices?
Also at least a couple of plain USB port instead of just one would be
very nice improvement
Cheers
Gio
On 2025-02-12 19:44, John Crispin wrote:
Hi,
starting a [VOTE] to get approval allow
On 13.02.25 10:55, Bjørn Mork via openwrt-devel wrote:
Nice. And with lots of docs already public. But no existing driver?
Will Maxlinear (or whoever owns the brand at the moment) upstream a DSA
driver for this chip, or is that going to be part of the OpenWrt effort?
A DSA driver exists but
śr., 12 lut 2025 o 19:46 John Crispin napisał(a):
>
> Hi,
>
> starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development
> of OpenWrt "Two".
>
> "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following
> upgrades.
>
> * MT7988
> * 10G SFP
> * 5G copper
> * 4 port 2.5G copp
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
John Crispin writes:
> the switc
On 13.02.25 09:17, Bjørn Mork via openwrt-devel wrote:
John Crispin writes:
* 10G SFP
* 5G copper
* 4 port 2.5G copper
* 1-2 port 1G copper
May I ask about the reasoning here? Just curious.
Which switch and phys are being considered?
the switch will be Maxlinear MXL86252
And why 5g inst
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
Szanowni Państwo,
w imieniu polsk
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message ---
John Crispin writes:
> * 10G SFP
21 matches
Mail list logo
