Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ar71xx] Help with Ubiquiti Rocket M5 XW support patch

Hi Roger, how many ethernet ports does this product has? 1 or 2? Ubiquity add a switch chip to it's new nanostation m (xw). I would say this product has only one port. Can you try this init please? static void __init ubnt_rocket_m_xw_setup(void) { ubnt_xw_init(); ath79_register_mdio(0, ~BIT

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/2] ar71xx: spi cleanup for ap121, db120, ubnt-xm and ap136

Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin --- ...ath79-make-chipselect-logic-more-flexible.patch | 89 -- .../patches-3.18/603-MIPS-ath79-ap121-fixes.patch | 40 +- .../patches-3.18/605-MIPS-ath79-db120-fixes.patch | 10 +-- .../607-MIPS-ath79-ubnt-xm-fixes.patch | 1

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/2] ar71xx: merge ap81 patches into one

Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin --- ...ath79-make-chipselect-logic-more-flexible.patch | 21 - .../patches-3.18/604-MIPS-ath79-ap81-fixes.patch | 50 ++ ...614-MIPS-ath79-ap81-remove-mtd-partitions.patch | 49 - 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 117

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt release name

i also love two more names: * drivers delight * dozen daiquiri the first one is without alcohol :-/ but there are at least some openwrt-users who are under-age! the second one would be nice to scare barkeepers, but its a COMMON cocktail! it really means: please, 12 drinks... especially within o

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 4/4] ar71xx: Increase RXD/RDV to 2 on OM5P-AN

It was reported that OM5P-AN needs not only a delay setting of 1 for RXD/RDV but 2. These was found when testing with a NetGear GS752TP POE switch with a cable length of 50ft and 250ft. Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann --- target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-om5p.c | 5 ++--- 1 file chan

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/4] ar71xx: add a helper function to set RXDV/RXD of ETH_CFG on AR934x

The ETH_RXDV_DELAY (17:16) and ETH_RXD_DELAY (15:14) are currently not cleared by the function ath79_setup_ar934x_eth_cfg. Clearing these in the ath79_setup_ar934x_eth_cfg may cause problems on some hardware because they rely on the preset value by the bootloader. Instead another function is intro

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] ar71xx: add mask and shift for RXD/RDV bits in AR934X register file

The commit r38948 ("ag71xx: add F1E specific feature bit definitions to AR934X register file") introduced definitions for some bits in the RDV/RXD part of the ETH_CFG register of AR934x. These are incomplete because ETH_RXDV_DELAY is specified as 17:16 and ETH_RXD_DELAY is specified 15:14. The orig

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/4] ar71xx: Remove TX/RX delay from pll_1000 for OM5P-AN

The tx/rx delay bits in the ETH_XMII_CONTROL register have to be unset when the enable_rgmii_rx_delay/enable_rgmii_tx_delay will be set in the AT803x PHY. Othwise the throughput in gigabit mode is heavily reduced. Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann --- target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt documentation team

In other words: "welcome to the team" :) On 2015-04-15 04:23, Javier Domingo Cansino wrote: > As far as I know, regarding documentation, there is no a specific group of > people. I just edit the wiki whenever I see something is not contained and I > can > explain it correctly. > > On Tue, Apr

[OpenWrt-Devel] [ar71xx] Help with Ubiquiti Rocket M5 XW support patch

Hi, I've been working on supporting the new XW version of Ubiquiti's Rocket M5 devices. The hardware is very similar to the NanoStation [Loco] M5 XW, so the images for these devices work on the Rocket *except* for the Ethernet interface. I posted some information about the device in the forum

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt documentation team

As far as I know, regarding documentation, there is no a specific group of people. I just edit the wiki whenever I see something is not contained and I can explain it correctly. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:20 PM Eric Schultz wrote: > All, > > I'm looking to improve some of the documentation aroun

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH V2] b53: override CPU port state on BCM5301X with CPU port other than 8

On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 09:01 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 15 April 2015 at 07:37, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 19:01 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Newer revisions (5+) of BCM53011 and probably all revs of BCM53012 > >> require overriding CPU port to work. So far we were handling

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH V2] b53: override CPU port state on BCM5301X with CPU port other than 8

On 15 April 2015 at 07:37, Ian Kent wrote: > On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 19:01 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> Newer revisions (5+) of BCM53011 and probably all revs of BCM53012 >> require overriding CPU port to work. So far we were handling it only for >> CPU port 8, but some devices may use e.g. port 5