I've been buying batches of Hornet-UB based routers with OpenWrt preinstalled
from data-alliance.net for a while now; today I got a message from them that
they were unable to install the OpenWrt image they'd been using on any
of the Hornet-UB boards in the latest batch they received from Alfa.
Fro
Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin
---
target/linux/rb532/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/rb532/Makefile b/target/linux/rb532/Makefile
index 0a6bd71..e5c6ad7 100644
--- a/target/linux/rb532/Makefile
+++ b/target/linux/rb532/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +1
because block2mtd wants "erasesize must be a divisor of device size" since 3.15
Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin
---
target/linux/rb532/image/Makefile | 10 +-
target/linux/rb532/image/gen_image.sh | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/rb
Signed-off-by: Roman Yeryomin
---
target/linux/rb532/config-3.18 | 146 +
.../rb532/patches-3.18/001-cmdline_hack.patch | 20 +++
.../rb532/patches-3.18/002-rb532_nand_fixup.patch | 47 +++
...tion_info-rename-rootfs-to-rootfs_onboard.patch | 1
Radvd isn't part of OpenWrt for a while. dnsmasq doesn't support
downstream delegation and its DHCPv6 features aren't well integrated if
you have a dynamic prefix e.g. delegated from your ISP.
Cheers,
Steven
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-de
On 26/03/2015 19:17, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
> procd: add jail support 45010
>
> leads to build errors on some? arches
>
> On omap I get:
> /jail/seccomp-bpf.h:72:3: error: #w$
> # warning "Platform does not support seccomp filter yet"
>
> which fails the build completely (-Werror issue)
>
Citeren Steven Barth :
This breaks clients that need fixed IPs (in my case, mostly webmail
clients).
I wonder why they are so sensitive to source-address changes since
their old address is still valid and not deprecated so there is no
need to switch.
Webmail clients usually don't keep a c
On 26/03/2015 19:27, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> Earlier today I was working on some dnsmasq changes. When I pulled the
> latest updates I was surprised by the (new to me) 'jail' related
> updates. Is there any documentation that I may be able to read to
> understand how I can update m
On 26/03/2015 19:47, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> On 26/03/2015 18:39, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>> On 26/03/2015 19:17, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
>>> procd: add jail support 45010
>>>
>>> leads to build errors on some? arches
>>>
>>> On omap I get:
>>> /jail/seccomp-bpf.h:72:3: error: #w$
>>>
This breaks clients that need fixed IPs (in my case, mostly webmail
clients).
I wonder why they are so sensitive to source-address changes since their
old address is still valid and not deprecated so there is no need to switch.
I would gladly send the DHCPv6 address with 0 preferred lifetime
On 26/03/2015 18:36, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> Citeren Steven Barth :
>
>>> In that case, I have a lot of bug reports to file, because none of
>>> the DHCPv6 clients I tried were happy with preferred lifetimes of 1
>>> second on their leases (which includes Windows 7, 8.1 and openSUSE
>>> 13.2).
>> S
On 26/03/2015 18:39, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 26/03/2015 19:17, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
>> procd: add jail support 45010
>>
>> leads to build errors on some? arches
>>
>> On omap I get:
>> /jail/seccomp-bpf.h:72:3: error: #w$
>> # warning "Platform does not support seccomp filter yet"
>>
>> w
On 26/03/2015 19:17, Dirk Neukirchen wrote:
> procd: add jail support 45010
>
> leads to build errors on some? arches
>
> On omap I get:
> /jail/seccomp-bpf.h:72:3: error: #w$
> # warning "Platform does not support seccomp filter yet"
>
> which fails the build completely (-Werror issue)
>
Citeren Steven Barth :
In that case, I have a lot of bug reports to file, because none of
the DHCPv6 clients I tried were happy with preferred lifetimes of 1
second on their leases (which includes Windows 7, 8.1 and openSUSE
13.2).
Sorry, I cannot confirm this. I just tried it with both Win
procd: add jail support 45010
leads to build errors on some? arches
On omap I get:
/jail/seccomp-bpf.h:72:3: error: #w$
# warning "Platform does not support seccomp filter yet"
which fails the build completely (-Werror issue)
I think there are some issues with other arch/detection when bui
Hi.
> Is there any way to synchronously (blocking) reload or restart the
> network configuration?
>
> "ubus call network reload" (or "restart") returns immediately, and the
> re-configuration happens asynchronously in the background. I'd like the
> command to block or otherwise wait until the rec
Hello,
Is there any way to synchronously (blocking) reload or restart the
network configuration?
"ubus call network reload" (or "restart") returns immediately, and the
re-configuration happens asynchronously in the background. I'd like the
command to block or otherwise wait until the reconfigurat
In that case, I have a lot of bug reports to file, because none of the
DHCPv6 clients I tried were happy with preferred lifetimes of 1 second
on their leases (which includes Windows 7, 8.1 and openSUSE 13.2).
Sorry, I cannot confirm this. I just tried it with both Windows 8.1 and
Debian test
Signed-off-by: Christian Mehlis
---
kmodloader.c | 2 +-
log/logread.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kmodloader.c b/kmodloader.c
index 8f41e74..387678a 100644
--- a/kmodloader.c
+++ b/kmodloader.c
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int main_loader(int argc, cha
Hi All,
New here, new to openwrt, not really a developer, more a willing idiot.
Appreciate your help, patience, guidance etc.
I've been following dnsmasq git master for a year or two on other router
firmware projects and have always tried to keep them up to date. I'd
like to do the same with/fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Maybe you have been at the Chaos Communication Congress in Germany the
last years. Then may you saw the WPA2 802.1X encrypted /public open
wireless access points/, where a user/client can choose their own
(random) name/password credentials.
https
Citeren Steven Barth :
Hello Arjen,
most likely, your DHCPv6 client implementation is faulty and you
should probably file a bug for more than one reason.
In that case, I have a lot of bug reports to file, because none of the
DHCPv6 clients I tried were happy with preferred lifetimes of 1
If anyone wants to organize a BattleMesh event in Hungary, I would
vote for that and have a near industrial amount of various compatible
hardware standing by!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Gergely Kiss wrote:
> On 03/21/2015 08:51 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 10 March 2015 at 21:
Le mercredi 25 mars 2015 à 11:43 -0400, John Szakmeister a écrit :
> Why not just use:
>
> ./scripts/config/conf --savedefconfig=config.seed Config.in
When building systems for release, one has to be very careful for
security.
IMHO, I would not leave a toolchain and configuration on a build
Hi.
> During the discussions for the OpenWireless/OpenWrt security hackathon
> in April, one of the participants asked if there's a way to report
> security vulnerabilities in OpenWrt. I didn't know of one so I figured
> I should ask. Is there a recommended process for reporting a security
> vulner
Hello Arjen,
most likely, your DHCPv6 client implementation is faulty and you should
probably file a bug for more than one reason.
If the DHCPv6 server sends values for T1 and / or T2 which are valid the
client must honor them and not try to be "smart" about lifetimes of
addresses.
Besides
Le mercredi 25 mars 2015 à 14:31 -0500, Eric Schultz a écrit :
> During the discussions for the OpenWireless/OpenWrt security hackathon
> in April, one of the participants asked if there's a way to report
> security vulnerabilities in OpenWrt. I didn't know of one so I figured
> I should ask. Is th
27 matches
Mail list logo
