On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:55:03 +0100, John Crispin wrote:
> ok, i think the spi clock is just really slow
>
> m25p80@0 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> compatible = "s25fl129p0";
>
Hi guys,
What is the best alternative to TDMA when using OpenWRT and Outdoor /
PtMP access ? Any specific configuration to be done in OpenWRT in order
to deal with multiple clients in different ranges ?
Thanks
Fernando
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
On 15/02/2015 00:31, David Lang wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>
>> Hello, I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
>> programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to
>> use. In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hello,
I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to use.
In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one of the most
reliable ways to restrict/sandbox proces
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
> > I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
> > certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
> > revoke a certificate.
> Well, 25 bucks [1] is not a crazily high price for a
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:18:56 +0100, Claudio Leite
wrote:
The VID header offset must be specified explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
Added with some more explanation in the commit log as r44455.
Thanks,
Imre
___
openwrt-devel mailing lis
On Saturday, February 14, 2015 08:40:59 PM Saverio Proto wrote:
> I think the one for the NanoStation should work as well:
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/openwrt-ar
> 71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin
>
> I never tested, but ubnt devices are all
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:36:19 +0100
Saverio Proto wrote:
> I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
> certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
> revoke a certificate.
Well, 25 bucks [1] is not a crazily high price for a one-time fee. :)
--
On 14/02/2015 17:26, Russell Senior wrote:
>
> fixes bug introduced by r44349 which prevents, e.g. AsiaRF AWM002
> from booting.
oops my bad, the config files currently used are the ones for 3.18
i will push a different patch that adds the old files in a sec
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell Senio
I think the one for the NanoStation should work as well:
http://downloads.openwrt.org/barrier_breaker/14.07/ar71xx/generic/openwrt-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-xw-squashfs-factory.bin
I never tested, but ubnt devices are all similar.
Saverio
2015-02-12 21:27 GMT+01:00 Ken Buska :
> Is there anyon
I think the business model of StartSSL and others, is that they give
certificates for free, but you have to pay a lot in case you need to
revoke a certificate.
my 2 cents
Saverio
2015-02-14 19:31 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Di Federico :
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:21:41 +0100
> phaidros wrote:
>
>> No
Git internals are referenced by .git which isn't necessarily a
directory. It may also be a file that references the actual .git
directory using the gitdir directive.
If .git is assumed to be a directory the build will not be able to get
the correct version when openwrt is included as a git submodu
ok, i think the spi clock is just really slow
m25p80@0 {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "s25fl129p0";
reg = <0 0>;
linux,modalias = "m25p80
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:21:41 +0100
phaidros wrote:
> Nope, I would vote against StartSSL. I know it is free, but the
> procedure sucks, and honestly: there is *one* company on the planet
> givin out *free* SSL Certs .. if that doesn't ring bells, I dunno what
> could :)
They just say you're who
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 14:54 +0100, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Hi Nikos,
> Can you send size with/without seccomp option
I compiled openwrt on lantiq (3.18.7) and the size with seccomp filter
is:
1481440 Feb 14 19:12 openwrt-lantiq-xway-WBMR-uImage
3695419 Feb 14 19:12 openwrt-lantiq-xway-WBMR-uIm
Hi,
> Nope, I would vote against StartSSL. I know it is free, but the
> procedure sucks, and honestly: there is *one* company on the planet
> givin out *free* SSL Certs .. if that doesn't ring bells, I dunno what
> could :)
hehe - if they would force you to use "private" keys generated on their s
procd gets last console from cmdline, so swapping tty1 (framebuffer) and
ttyAMA0 (uart) is enough to force procd output via uart
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
---
target/linux/brcm2708/base-files/etc/inittab | 1 -
target/linux/brcm2708/image/cmdline.txt | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
---
package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh
b/package/base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh
index eb5b240..5
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
---
target/linux/brcm2708/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 25 +++
.../brcm2708/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 11 +++
target/linux/brcm2708/base-files/lib/brcm2708.sh | 36 ++
.../lib/preinit/03_preinit_do_brcm270
On 14 February 2015 at 09:21, phaidros wrote:
> On 02/14/2015 04:42 PM, Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:18:44 +0100
>> phaidros wrote:
>>
>>> if someone could me provide with any of those:
>>> r...@wiki.openwrt.org
>>> hostmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
>>> postmas
On 02/14/2015 04:42 PM, Alessandro Di Federico wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:18:44 +0100
> phaidros wrote:
>
>> if someone could me provide with any of those:
>> r...@wiki.openwrt.org
>> hostmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
>> postmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
>> ad...@wiki.openwrt.org
>>
The VID header offset must be specified explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
---
target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile
b/target/linux/mvebu/image/Makefile
index 3512c6a..da7d217 100644
-
Some Lantiq SoCs are not able to use buffered writes properly with
Intel command set flash due to the way NOR addresses on EBU are
manipulated. This patch disables buffered writes on those devices.
The only device affected at the moment is ARV4510PW, others use
AMD/Fujitsu command set.
Signed-off-
For targets with NO_XIP ltq_mtd->map[i].phys equals -1 and devm_ioremap fails.
Fix this by using pdev->resource[i].start instead.
Signed-off-by: Matti Laakso
---
target/linux/lantiq/patches-3.14/0160-owrt-lantiq-multiple-flash.patch | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --g
fixes bug introduced by r44349 which prevents, e.g. AsiaRF AWM002
from booting.
Signed-off-by: Russell Senior
---
target/linux/ramips/rt305x/config-default | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/rt305x/config-default
b/target/linux/ramips/rt305x/config-default
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:18:44 +0100
phaidros wrote:
> if someone could me provide with any of those:
> r...@wiki.openwrt.org
> hostmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
> postmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
> ad...@wiki.openwrt.org
> webmas...@wiki.openwrt.org
>
> I'd be able to do the CA
Hi Nikos,
Le 14 févr. 2015 13:49, "Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos" a écrit
:
>
> Hello,
> I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
> programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to use.
> In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one of the most
> reliable w
Hello,
I've added libseccomp into packages. That library allows
programs to easily restrict the system calls they are allowed to use.
In turn that uses the kernel's seccomp filter. That's one of the most
reliable ways to restrict/sandbox processes into specific tasks which
cannot be overriden eve
(with r44364 cherry-picked so that openssl builds)
still broken at r44439.
[0.00] Linux version 3.14.32 (openwrt@iris) (gcc version 4.8.3
(OpenWrt/Linaro GCC 4.8-2014.04 r44364) ) #1 Fri Feb 13 21:49:18 PST 2015
[0.00] SoC Type: Ralink RT5350 id:1 rev:3
[0.00] bootconsol
29 matches
Mail list logo
