Hi, > Nope, I would vote against StartSSL. I know it is free, but the > procedure sucks, and honestly: there is *one* company on the planet > givin out *free* SSL Certs .. if that doesn't ring bells, I dunno what > could :)
hehe - if they would force you to use "private" keys generated on their servers, then I would agree. But this is not the case. Thus I do not see a potential security issue. But maybe I am missing something? Personally I like their uncomplicated procedures. The only (visible) drawback is the lack of an "organization" field in the certificate - thus it does not emanate the trustful aura of a corporation. Anyway - feel free to ignore these personal opinions ... Lars
pgp9ss81D6wIw.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
