The 7Links PX-4885 is a small battery-powered wireless router.
It is based on a RT5350F WiSoC and features one ethernet port and one
USB port. It is a Hame MPR-A1 clone, except it has different GPIOs,
a different battery and more RAM (32 MB).
This patch adds a profile for this board, the correspond
Or is Atheros chips the only offering.
Thanks,
John Clark.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Le 21/04/2014 19:30, John Crispin a écrit :
> patch looks good ... but ... 7links-px-4885-675 is awfully long. can
> we use px4885 instead ?
This is long indeed.
I'll send another patch with the names changed.
I'll also correct a mistake I made in uci-defaults/01_leds.
Regards.
___
Hi John,
* John Crispin (j...@phrozen.org) wrote:
>
> is there a difference between these 2 patches and the 3/3 that was
> posted earlier ? i already have the 3/3 in my local queue, wanna make
> sure i push the correct patch ...
>
No difference in the code. I just figured it made more sense to
BT Home Hub 2B: use overlayfs on top of ubi.
Signed-off-by: Ben Mulvihill
---
target/linux/lantiq/dts/BTHOMEHUBV2B.dts | 14 +++---
target/linux/lantiq/xway/config-default | 17 +
target/linux/lantiq/xway/profiles/bt.mk |4
target/linux/lantiq/xway/target
>> I have never used the version part of this file actually, I use it
>> solely to set the source path to a local tree.
Same here. We actually used it to interface OpenWrt with SCM which are not
supported natively by OpenWrt like P4.
> Right, that is a valid usecase, but package-version-overri
Hi,
On 21/04/2014 19:19, Hugo Grostabussiat wrote:
> The 7Links PX-4885-675 is a small battery-powered wireless router.
> It is based on a RT5350F WiSoC and features one ethernet port and
> one USB port. It is a Hame MPR-A1 clone, except it has different
> GPIOs, a different battery and more RAM
The 7Links PX-4885-675 is a small battery-powered wireless router.
It is based on a RT5350F WiSoC and features one ethernet port and one
USB port. It is a Hame MPR-A1 clone, except it has different GPIOs,
a different battery and more RAM (32 MB).
This patch adds a profile for this board, the corres
On 21/04/2014 17:57, Claudio Leite wrote:
> Generates webflash-compatible images for a few RT2880 routers
> based on Gemtek OEM boards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
is there a difference between these 2 patches and the 3/3 that was
posted earlier ? i already have the 3/3 in my local queue,
On 21 April 2014 14:17, John Crispin wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
>
>>> the etehrnet driver needs the phy driver to be present when the
>>> of_phy_connect() is called. to my knowledge there is no mechanism
>>> for defeered phy attach logic.
>
>
> i just verified to be 100% and i am correct on this. obviou
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
---
target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile
b/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile
index bf9ccc1..26386bf 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile
+++
Generates webflash-compatible images for a few RT2880 routers based
on Gemtek OEM boards.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Leite
---
tools/firmware-utils/Makefile | 1 +
tools/firmware-utils/src/mkheader_gemtek.c | 211 +
2 files changed, 212 insertions(+)
creat
* John Crispin (j...@phrozen.org) wrote:
> > - GPIOs 8 and 13 (WPS LEDs) do not work. The fix is to turn off bit
> > 6 in the RT2880 SYSTEM_CONFIG register. Not sure where this should
> > go--I put together a quick hack that does this in the rt2880 GPIO
> > driver and triggered from the DT node. Th
Hi Roman,
>> the etehrnet driver needs the phy driver to be present when the
>> of_phy_connect() is called. to my knowledge there is no mechanism
>> for defeered phy attach logic.
i just verified to be 100% and i am correct on this. obviously the phy
driver need to be loaded prior to the netwo
On 21/04/2014 12:16, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 21 April 2014 12:55, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/04/2014 10:58, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>> The target was ramips, rt2880 and rt305x subtargets at least.
>>> I'm not sure how rtl8366xx differs from ip175e but both realtek
>>> switch and smi
On 21 April 2014 12:55, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 21/04/2014 10:58, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> The target was ramips, rt2880 and rt305x subtargets at least. I'm
>> not sure how rtl8366xx differs from ip175e but both realtek switch
>> and smi parts are under drivers/net/phy/. I remember when I
>>
On 21/04/2014 10:58, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> The target was ramips, rt2880 and rt305x subtargets at least. I'm
> not sure how rtl8366xx differs from ip175e but both realtek switch
> and smi parts are under drivers/net/phy/. I remember when I
> submitted a patch to exclude realtek switch from tar
On 21 April 2014 11:45, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 21/04/2014 10:36, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB
flash, 100mbit IP175E switch and
On 21/04/2014 10:36, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
>>> The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB
>>> flash, 100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
>>>
>>> Notes: - I could
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 09:29 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2014 07:06, Ben Mulvihill wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > May I take up your offer of a hand with overlayfs on top of ubi? I
> > have in fact managed to get a working overlay + ubi image, and also
> > a ubifs image. But I still have
On 21 April 2014 11:05, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
>> The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB flash,
>> 100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
>>
>> Notes: - I couldn't get the switch to be recognized without
>> building i
On 21/04/2014 05:18, Claudio Leite wrote:
> The Airlink101 AR725W is a RT2880 router with 32MB RAM, 4MB flash,
> 100mbit IP175E switch and dual-band 802.11n wireless.
>
> Notes: - I couldn't get the switch to be recognized without
> building it into the kernel, rather than as a module. Since th
On 21/04/2014 07:06, Ben Mulvihill wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> May I take up your offer of a hand with overlayfs on top of ubi? I
> have in fact managed to get a working overlay + ubi image, and also
> a ubifs image. But I still have a few questions:
>
> - Am I right in thinking that there is no way
23 matches
Mail list logo
