> I also think that testing/developing branches are useful. And it gives
> the chance to the OpenWRT users to test new stuff by adding
> ";testing_branch" in the feeds.conf file of the buildroot.
>
+1!
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I also think that testing/developing branches are useful. And it gives
the chance to the OpenWRT users to test new stuff by adding
";testing_branch" in the feeds.conf file of the buildroot.
Cheers
On 07/10/13 19:54, Saverio Proto wrote:
>> *) we shou
> *) we should not have feature or testing branches in feeds
what is the problem with testing branches ?
as long as the necessary branches are there with the correct names, I
dont see the drawback of the extra branches.
thanks
Saverio
___
openwrt-deve
Hello Luka,
my github name is zioproto and my email is correct in the MAINTAINERS file.
Saverio
2013/10/6 Luka Perkov :
> Dear openwrt-routing feed committers,
>
> I've added MAINTAINERS file to the openwrt-routing git repository.
> Please update that file with your real name and valid email add
Good afternoon,
I have a question about sysupgrade image for Ramips routers that uses
Seama.
Shouldn't sysupgrade image contain the same magic as factory image?
Currently generated sysupgrade image for my router (D-Link DIR-610 A1)
doesn't have it, causing sysupgrade to reject the image.
Hello,
Does someone know if is possible to request the option 64 (AFTR Name)
using the wide-dhcpv6 (dhcpv6 client) ? Or do I switch to Odhcp6c ?
I did not find any way to configure it for that, I tried:
interface eth0.1 {
send ia-pd 0;
send ia-na 0;
script "/usr/bin/dhcp6c
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:48:37PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
> None of the above is a problem except for the communication with the
> maintainers itself.
Sorry about that. I had no bad intentions and I agree my approach was
wrong.
> I can't speak on behalf of everybody but I did not
On Monday 07 October 2013 10:08:55 Luka Perkov wrote:
> > maybe I am the only one who does not know what is going on but who are you
> > to mandate what is happening with the openwrt-routing feed ? I don't
> > remember you being present when this feed was created. Did we choose a
> > benevolent dec
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:08:55AM +0200, Luka Perkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:39:17PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
> > > I've added MAINTAINERS file to the openwrt-routing git repository.
> > > Please update that file with your real name and valid email address,
> > > reply t
Hi Marek,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:39:17PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote:
> > I've added MAINTAINERS file to the openwrt-routing git repository.
> > Please update that file with your real name and valid email address,
> > reply to this email that you did so and tell us your github account
> > name.
Hi Luka,
> I've added MAINTAINERS file to the openwrt-routing git repository.
> Please update that file with your real name and valid email address,
> reply to this email that you did so and tell us your github account
> name.
>
> I'm going to remove access to those of you who don't do the above
11 matches
Mail list logo
