Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][V2] Zabbix: add extra packages with discovery/userparameter

2012-12-23 Thread Etienne CHAMPETIER
Hi -i don't use {#DEV}, and it's a uci bug, i should just suppress it? -for the wifi.discovery i'm always using phy instead of macaddress in wireless config (so i can flash a spare router quickly). you can suppress the {#PHY} part, or find another way? (don't use it i think) -for the txpower i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][V2] Zabbix: add extra packages with discovery/userparameter

2012-12-23 Thread Etienne CHAMPETIER
Hi, sorry to top-post but this f***ing tablet is against me, so i will just answer in the order. -The "wifi" package should also work with broadcom-wl and madwifi, where the "mac80211" is only for mac80211. I split up to put dependencies, and in case someone want to make "extra-madwifi" later.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH RFC] [lantiq] Fix switch issues on the wbmr-hp-g300h

2012-12-23 Thread Sebastian Mayr
On Fr, 2012-12-21 at 21:51 +0100, John Crispin wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the patch, i pushed it into svn ... please verify that the > issue is now fixed. > > John The issue is fixed, switch and vlan work nicely on the wbmr-hp-g300h with the current trunk. -- Sebastian Mayr

[OpenWrt-Devel] tl-wr741nd v4.21

2012-12-23 Thread HeXiLeD
Aside what is written on the wiki: "v4.21 - trunk (32793) Confirmed working with trunk 32793, probably working with earlier." http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/tp-link/tl-wr741nd Can anyone confirm if it is really FULLY working with trunk ? ___ ope

[OpenWrt-Devel] regression: Serial flash not found on linksys e1000 (brcm47162)

2012-12-23 Thread hhm
Hi, Until recently (including with the RC1 release of OpenWrt Attitude Adjustment) things were working ok on the linksys e1000 (besides the things which were not ready then). However, using recent builds of trunk (built by me, and built by http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/), the serial flas

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] WDR3600 802.11n HT40 performance

2012-12-23 Thread Felix Fietkau
On 2012-12-23 6:15 AM, Ben West wrote: > Likewise, I'm a bit curious about the 170Mbit/s throughput reported by > iperf. A reported 300Mbit/s link speed is TX+RX aggregate, i.e. > 150Mbit/s each for the TX and RX chains combined, and the actual > throughput would be diminished both by imperfect wi