It got obsoleted by r27169, r27170 and r27209.
mirko
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:26:22 -0400, Pawel Pastuszak wrote:
Thanks guys for the support the last patch did the trick to compile
everything.
Do you think i should include this patch also or is it unneeded
https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ti
On 06/17/2011 10:54 PM, Aleksandar Radovanovic wrote:
On 06/17/2011 11:49 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:49 +0200, Ithamar R. Adema wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:21 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Maybe calling "reboot" at all is not such a great idea as it
attempts to
On 06/17/2011 11:49 AM, D.S. Ljungmark wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:49 +0200, Ithamar R. Adema wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:21 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>> Maybe calling "reboot" at all is not such a great idea as it
>>> attempts to run the (former) init scripts to stop th
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
> > On 6/17/11 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> >> Phillip,
> >> What would be the advantage of ipsec over OpenVPN?
> >>
> >> In my experience, if you have Asterisk de
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> On 6/17/11 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
>> Phillip,
>> What would be the advantage of ipsec over OpenVPN?
>>
>> In my experience, if you have Asterisk deployed, the call is
>> routed through Asterisk, which handles the Nat tr
accidently hit the send button...
Hi,
i created a c++ program and while testing it (it sends upd packets) i created
a few millions packages and sent them to 192.168.1.1:4950 (my router running
openwrt). its a wl500gP v1. while i was doing this the device gets
unresponsive and i get lines like
Hi,
i created a c++ and while testing it i created a few millions packages and
sent them to port 4950 an router running openwrt. its a wl500gP v1.
while i was doing this the device gets unresponsive and i get lines like this:
b44 ssb0:0: eth0: powering down PHY
b44 ssb0:0: eth0: powering down PH
Hi Joe,
Here is the extra information.
configure:3637: $? = 0
configure:3644: powerpc-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-openwrt-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/openwrt_trunk-glibc/build_dir/toolchain-powerpc_gcc-4.4.5_glibc-2.6.1/gcc-4.4.5/configure
--prefix=/openwrt
On 6/17/11 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> Phillip,
> What would be the advantage of ipsec over OpenVPN?
>
> In my experience, if you have Asterisk deployed, the call is
> routed through Asterisk, which handles the Nat traversal fairly well.
> Are you describing a sip re-invite, where t
I think the key piece of information here is
See `config.log' for more details.
You might get some better help posting the details of the error ;-)
Joe
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:38:08 -0400, Pawel Pastuszak wrote:
Hi Gents,
Any thoughts on this, Again i using the glibc 2.6.1 and gcc 4.4.5
Hi Gents,
Any thoughts on this, Again i using the glibc 2.6.1 and gcc 4.4.5 on ubuntu
10.10 and it's trunk check out.
make[3]: Entering directory `/openwrt_trunk-glibc/feeds/packages/libs/mysql'
. /openwrt_trunk-glibc/include/shell.sh; .
/openwrt_trunk-glibc/include/shell.sh; gzip -dc
/openwrt_
Thanks guys for the support the last patch did the trick to compile
everything.
Do you think i should include this patch also or is it unneeded
https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/9012/hotplug2.patch
Pawel
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mirko Vogt wrote:
> Hello Pawel,
>
> this issue
Phillip,
What would be the advantage of ipsec over OpenVPN?
In my experience, if you have Asterisk deployed, the call is
routed through Asterisk, which handles the Nat traversal fairly well.
Are you describing a sip re-invite, where the local phone connects
directly to the remote end?
~Jo
Really? No interest in this at all? Not even enough to trial it to see if
it's useful?
On 5/29/11 10:34 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I've been thinking about a couple of projects that I'd like to add (below) to
> OpenWRT, but that I don't always have the subject matter expertise to either
Hello Pawel,
this issue is related to: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9012
Attached patch should solve the issue - please report if it does the
job.
Cheers
mirko
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:39:26 -0400, Pawel Pastuszak wrote:
Hi gents,
I getting an hotplug complie error after i compiled the g
On 06/17/2011 04:39 PM, Pawel Pastuszak wrote:
Hi gents,
I getting an hotplug complie error after i compiled the gcc 4.4.5
toolcahin with glibc 2.6.1, please not this is a trunk check out
PS. I am using Ubuntu 10.10.
udevtrigger.c:(.text+0x538): undefined reference to `strlcpy'
udevtrigg
Hi gents,
I getting an hotplug complie error after i compiled the gcc 4.4.5 toolcahin
with glibc 2.6.1, please not this is a trunk check out
PS. I am using Ubuntu 10.10.
make[3]: Entering directory `/openwrt_trunk-glibc/package/hotplug2'
. /openwrt_trunk-glibc/include/shell.sh; .
/openwrt_trunk
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:49 +0200, Ithamar R. Adema wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 12:21 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> > Maybe calling "reboot" at all is not such a great idea as it attempts
> > to run the (former) init scripts to stop them.
>
> Maybe using we should use 'reboot -f' he
18 matches
Mail list logo
