On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Bennett <jbscienc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Philip Prindeville > <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > > On 6/17/11 9:35 AM, Jonathan Bennett wrote: > >> Phillip, > >> What would be the advantage of ipsec over OpenVPN? > >> > >> In my experience, if you have Asterisk deployed, the call is > >> routed through Asterisk, which handles the Nat traversal fairly well. > >> Are you describing a sip re-invite, where the local phone connects > >> directly to the remote end? > >> > >> ~Jonathan Bennett > > > > Well, I know a lot of hotspots (hotels, airports, etc) that don't handle > OpenVPN SSL... or even at all. > What do you mean? I've gotten OpenVPN through some very hostile > environments (a network that allows *only* web browsing, and that > going through a forced proxy and web filter). It uses a single tcp or > udp connection, which means it can get out through most any network. > > > > Also, IPsec QoS marking is easier to handle than mixing several protocols > over an SSL stream all with the same markings. > I can see the advantage of true QoS, though. I would imagine that > IPsec would be more efficient, too. > N2N is always a good choice for VPN capabilities
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
