It was pointed out to me that, when trying to develop a patch to enable
leds-net5501 for the net5501 subtarget and building 2.6.35.x, I needed to add
various CONFIG_xxx flags such as CONFIG_LEDS_NET5501=m to
target/linux/x86/net5501/config-defaults.
But, I thought, why? If I was adding "kmod-
he unstable version (multi-interfaces w/ ITACA)"
-
-endchoice
-
Index: net/wing/Makefile
===
--- net/wing/Makefile(revision 23569)
+++ net/wing/Makefile(working copy)
@@ -8,17 +8,10 @@
include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk
PKG_N
Helmut,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Helmut Schaa
wrote:
> I fully agree. The same also applies to rt2800pci SoCs (rt305x) which are
> working quite good already (in terms of WiFi) but also show more CPU usage
> then the legacy drivers.
>
> IMO it would really make sense to work on improving
I'm re-submitting the patch with the comments from Jo-Phillip
With some modems the ttyUSBx device/s are not automatically created
after the mode switch (for example with my k3765).
This patch adds a new id for the target device after the mode switch.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Riggio
--
Index: ut
Hi,
Am Donnerstag 21 Oktober 2010 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On Thursday 21 October 2010 13:43:17 scott.nicho...@scottn.us wrote:
> > That's what I was afraid of. Tho there is some CPU usage with legacy driver
> > using 2.4 kernel, it is sooo much worse with rt2x00. Softirqs take 50% and
> > kern
That's what I was afraid of. Tho there is some CPU usage with legacy driver
using 2.4 kernel, it is sooo much worse with rt2x00. Softirqs take 50% and
kernel other 50% (almost, I rounded up a bit).
Won't be worth submitting my work if no one would use it due bad wifi. So I'll
backport some chan
rt2x00/rt61pci wireless driver eats all the CPU. Any other boards use this?
Anyone with experience with this driver know if there was a better version than
the current compat-wireless in svn?
Sent via BlackBerry Bold 9700
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
