Here is the patch again without the email-client wrapping.
Also fixed a missing newline in soloscli. Please disregard previous patch.
Regards,
Nathan
Utility for interrogating Traverse Technologies' Solos ADSL2+ modems
Signed-off-by: Nathan Williams
---
package/soloscli/Makefile
Utility for interrogating Traverse Technologies' Solos ADSL2+ modems
Signed-off-by: Nathan Williams
---
package/soloscli/Makefile | 42
+++
package/soloscli/patches/000-Makefile.patch | 21 +
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions
Netgear WNDR3700 could also be a good option..I have just started on it and it
seems that there is lot of support on OpenWRT & in different forums. It's based
upon ATHEROS latest SoC AR7140 680 MHz CPU, 64MB RAM and also supports dual
band 2.4 Ghz & 5 Ghz. I also found it very easy to link with
So, if there are no problems, how about commiting it?
Roman
On 20 September 2010 23:57, Philip Prindeville
wrote:
> No other issues here (but then, I'm not an official reviewer).
>
>
> On 9/20/10 1:25 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>
>> Sure, good idea!
>>
>> Roman
>>
>> On 20 September 2010 04:20,
hi,
i'm working on a port & cross-compiled build (for openwrt backfire
10.03/atheros AR71xx, on openSUSE 11.3/x86_64) of perl 5.12.2, digging
through issues/bugs one at a time.
i've started with the existing package for perl 5.10.x from the repo.
i'm stuck at a fail of "build target miniperl bin
The Buffalo WZR-HP-G300NH is also pretty good : cheap (~$80), 64 MB RAM,
32 MB Flash, USB port and works perfectly with OpenWrt
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:14:27AM +0200, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark wrote:
> > There are some requirements (
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:14:27AM +0200, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark wrote:
> There are some requirements ( Decent amount of RAM (24+ Megs), USB
> support, ethernet ) but they are quite generic, I'm mostly looking for
> suggestions on devkits or boards to get started from.
SheevaPlug comes to mind
On 21 September 2010 12:43, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> The Routerstation Pro is always a good start, it's even part of an
> official MIPS evaluation kit. Plenty of Ram (128 MB), gigabit
> ethernet, JTAG, USB, three mini-PCI slots, etc.
Another less expensive alternative would be the BifferBoard, which
Routerstation is best bet. Fast, loaded, good support.
On Sep 21, 2010 6:08 AM, "Dennis M.D. Ljungmark" wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:13 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Gorski
>> >
wrote:
>> > On 21 September 2010 11:14, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Are you sure you really have an R3000? That's an very old processor
> released in 1988.
yes, cpuinfo refer to https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=26405
as this:
{{{
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : RTL8672
processor
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:55 PM, arrow zhang wrote:
> Here has a difficult problem for me, would like anyone give some advice
>
> On a mips r3000 cpu, here has a kernel crash when doing the insmod
> iptable_filter,
> The phenomenon is same as https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/6129
>
> 1, the FW is at
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 13:13 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Gorski
> wrote:
> > On 21 September 2010 11:14, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark wrote:
> >> Ahoy,
> >> We're currently looking at aquiring a few development boards for
> >> running OpenWRT on, ( not the
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Gorski
wrote:
> On 21 September 2010 11:14, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark wrote:
>> Ahoy,
>> We're currently looking at aquiring a few development boards for
>> running OpenWRT on, ( not the other way around, for once) so I figured
>> I'd ask here, what's a dece
On 21 September 2010 11:14, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark wrote:
> Ahoy,
> We're currently looking at aquiring a few development boards for
> running OpenWRT on, ( not the other way around, for once) so I figured
> I'd ask here, what's a decent board/hardware unit to make a few proof of
> concept units
Try
PC Engines ALIX
On 21 September 2010 10:14, Dennis M.D. Ljungmark wrote:
> Ahoy,
> We're currently looking at aquiring a few development boards for
> running OpenWRT on, ( not the other way around, for once) so I figured
> I'd ask here, what's a decent board/hardware unit to make a few pr
Ahoy,
We're currently looking at aquiring a few development boards for
running OpenWRT on, ( not the other way around, for once) so I figured
I'd ask here, what's a decent board/hardware unit to make a few proof of
concept units based on?
There are some requirements ( Decent amount of RAM (24+
16 matches
Mail list logo
