- "Tripp Lilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> config_foreach, I believe...
Well no, this is true only if your sections are like this:
config page
option display_name"Overview"
option menu"status"
instead in my case I have the following structur
Hello Erick,
If you need help in porting the ixp435 board, I may be able to help.
I'm familiar with OpenWrt and recently did a port to an ixp425 board:
http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Actiontec/MI424-WR
Regards,
Jose Vasconcellos
Florian Fainelli wrote:
> No idea why it only came to
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:28 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the following piece of uci configuration file in my
> application (a very streamlined web based reporting interface):
config_foreach, I believe...
E.g. (assuming config in /etc/config/reporter):
#!/bin/sh /etc/rc.common
setu
Hi,
I have the following piece of uci configuration file in my
application (a very streamlined web based reporting interface):
config page overview
option display_name "Overview"
option menu "status"
config page routes
option display_name "Routes"
Quoting Tripp Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:14 PM, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:50, Tripp Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I read "close" here as "working closely together," not as a typo
>>> for "closed."
>>
>> :) Thanks for the t
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:14 PM, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:50, Tripp Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I read "close" here as "working closely together," not as a typo for
>> "closed."
>
> :) Thanks for the typo/homonym help! That would certainly make more se
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:50, Tripp Lilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read "close" here as "working closely together," not as a typo for "closed."
:) Thanks for the typo/homonym help! That would certainly make more sense.
___
openwrt-devel mailing
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:43 AM, RB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We would like that have a close project to port the OpenWRT to our Yanomami
>> IXP435 board.
>
> I am not a core dev member, but I'd definitely see this as a problem -
> OpenWRT is GPL and based largely on GPL packages. A truly cl
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:08, Florian Fainelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No idea why it only came to me, forwarding to the list.
Nice-looking board; too bad the photos are too fuzzy to make out what
the flash/memory specs are offhand.
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Erick M
