Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread Sumit Dahiya
I added a route on Site B router (see my previous network diagram) as follows: - Source = Any Destination = 10.8.0.0/255.255.255.0 Gateway = 192.168.1.1 (this is Site A router) Metric = 20 Site B router provides a “ping diagnostic tool” that can be used to test connectivity directly from r

Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread Selva Nair
Hi, On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Sumit Dahiya wrote: > Sat Mar 26 01:13:08 2016 PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,route > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0,route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0,redirect-gateway > def1 bypass-dhcp,dhcp-option DNS 192.168.1.1,route 10.8.0.1,topology > net30,ping 1

Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread Sumit Dahiya
I have uploaded the diagram here: - https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6KoYLOFynuUcTVIc2tBdUl1RVk/view?usp=sharing The goal is to allow our "Road Warrior" access to NAS-2 device located at Site B. Under current configuraton, the Road Warrior can successfully access NAS-1 thus proving the fact that

Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:37:51PM -0400, Sumit Dahiya wrote: > You are right, our current site-to-site setup does not use OpenVPN. > Instead, it uses router's built-in functionality. Yes, but "built-in functionality" is some kind of software. What software that is may or may not be significant

Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread Selva Nair
Hi, On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Sumit Dahiya wrote: > You are right, our current site-to-site setup does not use OpenVPN. > Instead, > it uses router's built-in functionality. Couple of additional facts based > on > your comments: - > > 1. Our OpenVPN does not run on the router - it runs on

Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread Sumit Dahiya
You are right, our current site-to-site setup does not use OpenVPN. Instead, it uses router's built-in functionality. Couple of additional facts based on your comments: - 1. Our OpenVPN does not run on the router - it runs on a dedicated VPN server behind the router. 2. We have successfully added

Re: [Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread /dev/rob0
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:09:20PM -0400, Sumit Dahiya wrote: > Our organization has two work sites (called A and B) that have > successfully communicated over a site-to-site connection for > several years. This site-to-site has been configured using our > router/firewalls’ built-in features. D

[Openvpn-users] Site-to-site: VPN'd into one Site

2016-03-28 Thread Sumit Dahiya
Hi All, Our organization has two work sites (called A and B) that have successfully communicated over a site-to-site connection for several years. This site-to-site has been configured using our router/firewalls’ built-in features. Last week, we implemented OpenVPN at site A and got it working c