On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Jeff Boyce wrote:
>
> My issue description is posted at
> https://forums.openvpn.net/topic20369.html.
>
> I believe that my problem is a routing issue, but I have exhausted my
> avenues of research and knowledge.
The configs and routes on server & router look fin
Hi Jeff,
as you put so much work into your post on the forum I did not
want to hit you with an "off the cuff" answer ...
but I can, at least, see more clearly your situation.
Also, it seems to me, you have all the necessary tools and knowhow
to implement the solution yourself .. which you have ..
Hi guys,
after week of work I finally get my raspberry pi OpenVPN server
working. But my goal was to get an adblocker VPN. So now I need your
help, I found anything on the internet so I'm asking how can I do it
(of what I read I need a host file with DNS server ? I think I'm not
sure) So if you cou
Greetings -
I have a detailed description of my issue posted over on the Forum, but
am not getting any responses. A few reads over the course of several
weeks, but no responses. I posted it to the Forum after someone on the
list here suggested the Forum might be a better place for assistance.
* Selva Nair :
> manifest, but personally I think that's too invasive as there could be
> legitimate users who do not need to set routes, for example.
You mean a bridged VPN (TAP?)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
ralf.hildebra...@charite.deCampu
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:59:42PM +, jack seth wrote:
> Congrats on the latest release. Any eta on a 2.4?
Still aiming for "end of the year" - quite a few months to go :-)
Seriously: no idea, and we're as bad in predicting releases as most other
open source projects. We're slowly gett
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> >> Basically, for my W7 64b machine ..
> >> the right arch (64b) installled as expected, with UAC prompts
> >> GUI did *not* request elevation when started by normal user
>
> This matches the behavior I observed today with my Windows Server
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:48:04 +0200
From: Samuli Sepp?nen
Subject: [Openvpn-users] OpenVPN 2.3.10 released
To: "openvpn users list (openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net)"
,
"openvpn-de...@lists.sourceforge.net"
,
> It would need to be twice the size (two copies of everything),
Size matters not :)
> but besides that it would be really convenient indeed.
>
> *Building* that would require major work in the build system (which
> today gets told "build for *this* architecture and come up with a
> final insta
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:59:54AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Gert Doering :
>
> > Last time I tested on Win7/64, the 32 bit executables worked just fine
> > (this is how I noticed that installing 64 bit onto a system that already
> > has a 32 bit version installed causes two versions
* Gert Doering :
> Last time I tested on Win7/64, the 32 bit executables worked just fine
> (this is how I noticed that installing 64 bit onto a system that already
> has a 32 bit version installed causes two versions to be there...)
Yes, this shit happens to my users all the time.
I wonder if th
Hi,
> Below is the result of doing a manual verification of
> openvpn_2.3.10-debian0_amd64.deb using gpg:
>
> gpg --verify openvpn_2.3.10-debian0_amd64.deb
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: the signature could not be verified.
> Please remember that the signature file (.sig or .asc) shou
12 matches
Mail list logo
