Hi, On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:59:54AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de>: > > > Last time I tested on Win7/64, the 32 bit executables worked just fine > > (this is how I noticed that installing 64 bit onto a system that already > > has a 32 bit version installed causes two versions to be there...) > > Yes, this shit happens to my users all the time. > I wonder if the installer could be "universal" (meaning it could > contain both 32 and 64 bit versions and choose the correct arch > automatically).
It would need to be twice the size (two copies of everything), but
besides that it would be really convenient indeed.
*Building* that would require major work in the build system (which
today gets told "build for *this* architecture and come up with a
final installer!" and is sufficiently... $insertpoliteword that is not
easy to extend.
But then, it's not mine anyway, maybe Samuli likes this idea so much... :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-users mailing list Openvpn-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-users
