From: Antonio Quartulli
With this change it is possible to use ovpn-dco-win when running OpenVPN
in client or P2P mode.
Signed-off-by: Arne Schwabe
Signed-off-by: Lev Stipakov
Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli
---
Changes from v102:
* use "windows-driver ovpn-dco" without trailing "-win", si
From: Kristof Provost
Address a few minor code review remarks:
- use constants for the inet_ntop() buffers
- replace argv_printf() + argv_printf_cat() with a single argv_printf()
- net_route_v4/6 both add and remove, so adjust the error message to
reflect that.
Signed-off-by: Kristof Prov
I’ll post a patch.
> - any particular reason you used argv_printf() + argv_printf_cat(),
>instead of just putting all into a single argv_printf() call?
>
Mostly that that’s what src/openvpn/networking_iproute2.c does too. I
don’t have particularly strong feelings either way, so I’ll add that
Fo the reference - I have tested the installer
https://github.com/lstipakov/openvpn-build/actions/runs/2902240643
(which includes openvpn-build dco changes and openvpn master branch
with this patch)
on Windows 11 (VMware ESXi) - dco-win/tap-windows6/wintun drivers work
as expected.
I also ver
On 20 Aug 2022, at 16:33, Gert Doering wrote:
- iroute installation works for the easy cases (--route in
server.conf,
--iroute with a more-specific of that in ccd/). It does not work
for the nasty cases (--route and --iroute with same netbits).
I will send a followup e-mail with more
fping and fping6 were merged in version 4.0,
released in 2017. Many recent distributions do
not include the compatibility symlink anymore.
So if we find fping but not fping6 do not error
out but assume that fping is capable of IPv6.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld
---
tests/t_client.sh.in | 13
LibreSSL has added some of the functions that are defined here. However,
we still need RSA_F_RSA_OSSL_PRIVATE_ENCRYPT.
v2: Change ifdef condition for RSA_F_RSA_OSSL_PRIVATE_ENCRYPT.
v3: Don't break WolfSSL.
Signed-off-by: Max Fillinger
---
src/openvpn/openssl_compat.h | 8 +---
1 file chang
Am 22.08.22 um 17:40 schrieb Max Fillinger:
LibreSSL has added some of the functions that are defined here. However,
we still need RSA_F_RSA_OSSL_PRIVATE_ENCRYPT.
Thanks.
Acked-By: Arne Schwabe
___
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Openvpn-devel@lists.s
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > Now, back to FreeBSD.
> >
> > - our code does not try to set metrics on FreeBSD
> > - my reading of route(8) does not show me anything in that direction
> > (metric, preference, administrative distance, ...)
> > - I
On 22 Aug 2022, at 20:16, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote:
>>> Now, back to FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> - our code does not try to set metrics on FreeBSD
>>> - my reading of route(8) does not show me anything in that direction
>>> (metric, preferen
I have not tested this on a recent-enough OpenBSD or OpenSSL 1.0.x
(no time to build or find such a system) but I have tested on FreeBSD
with 1.1.1l - unsurprisingly (the #ifdef say so) no difference.
I'm a bit unsure if we need this for 2.5 - it's "long term compat"
and not very intrusive, but
Also we don't officially support it, it is nice to know when we break it.
Signed-off-by: Arne Schwabe
---
.github/workflows/build.yaml | 63
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yaml b/.github/workflows/build.yaml
index f4246
Signed-off-by: Arne Schwabe
---
.github/workflows/build.yaml | 24 +---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yaml b/.github/workflows/build.yaml
index dfa3953f0..6c2c3ef3e 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/build.yaml
+++ b/.github
I have not tested this on a recent-enough OpenBSD or OpenSSL 1.0.x
(no time to build or find such a system) but I have tested on FreeBSD
with 1.1.1l - unsurprisingly (the #ifdef say so) no difference.
I'm a bit unsure if we need this for 2.5 - it's "long term compat"
and not very intrusive, but
Same as for the previous patch, I have not tested this on a recent-enough
OpenBSD or OpenSSL 1.0.x (no time to build or find such a system) but I
have tested on FreeBSD with 1.1.1l and 3.0.3 - both OpenSSL builds still
work fine and pass client side tests.
Arne says this does not apply cleanly to
Acked-by: Gert Doering
Looks reasonable, and more test are always good. Tested by pushing to
my GH repo, and it builds all green today (no good starting with
"already broken" when nobody has much interest in working on it)
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit a79f8034cc679
Acked-by: Gert Doering
Same thing, "looks reasonable and all green on my github repo" :-)
Your patch has been applied to the master branch.
commit c0724527190d864b20fb3f5725ebdcadd8900697
Author: Arne Schwabe
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:41:47 2022 +0200
Include libressl and macOS 12 to macOS gi
In case this request was lost, here goes again. Can we have this
cherry-picked into 2.5 before the next release?
Selva
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 4:03 PM Selva Nair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:02 AM Gert Doering wrote:
>
>> Acked-by: Gert Doering
>>
>> I cannot test this (beyond "c
18 matches
Mail list logo
