hello,
here's new PR
https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn-build/pull/52
it is tricky to add http link to message box, I'd avoid using nsDialogs.nsh
now
2016-11-21 16:21 GMT+05:00 Илья Шипицин :
>
>
> 2016-11-21 16:14 GMT+05:00 Samuli Seppänen :
>
>> Il 21/11/2016 11:34, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
2016-11-21 16:14 GMT+05:00 Samuli Seppänen :
> Il 21/11/2016 11:34, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
>
>> as we will make it hard coded within installer, so, if "WinXP installer
>> link" will ever change, there'll be no way to change it in installer,
>> which were downloaded (as for our company, I can con
Il 21/11/2016 11:34, Илья Шипицин ha scritto:
> as we will make it hard coded within installer, so, if "WinXP installer
> link" will ever change, there'll be no way to change it in installer,
> which were downloaded (as for our company, I can confirm such practice,
> people download installer and p
as we will make it hard coded within installer, so, if "WinXP installer
link" will ever change, there'll be no way to change it in installer, which
were downloaded (as for our company, I can confirm such practice, people
download installer and put on smb shares, wiki, etc)
so, which is the proper
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:21:52AM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> However, how I understand Selva (and Gerts approval), is that the
> *installer* can displaying the v2.3 download URL - and perhaps even
> downloading it (on request).
This.
"This package does not work on your operating syste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21/11/16 08:57, ??? wrote:
> @mattock , can we use some url rewrite for that ?
URL rewrite? As on the web server? I think that is a very bad idea.
If you want to download a particular file, you should get what you
ask for. The web serv
@mattock , can we use some url rewrite for that ?
2016-11-21 12:53 GMT+05:00 Gert Doering :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:02:33PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> > As for 2.4 installer, if run on XP, showing a link to the latest 2.3.x
> > before bailing out is a nice thing to do. If its not to
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:02:33PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> As for 2.4 installer, if run on XP, showing a link to the latest 2.3.x
> before bailing out is a nice thing to do. If its not too much work, I would
> vote for offering to download the installer as well.
This sounds good, yes.
ge
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> due to dns filter, 2.4 (and future 2.3.14) requires at least windows vista.
2.3.x will continue to work on WindowsXP -- block-outside-dns in 2.3 branch
is handled using runtime loading of the library so the option is just
ignored with
