Hi,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:38:01AM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by
> side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask.
>
> We don't have client-2-client and didn't use the ifconfig-pool.
In that case, all this doesn'
Hi Eike,
Eike Lohmann wrote:
We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by
side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask.
Is this also working if I have 2 networks far away from each other (10.x
and 192.168.x), with defining a 'all your base belong to us' netm
We are working with static assignments and if the 2 networks are side by
side I can recompile the code and define a larger mask.
Is this also working if I have 2 networks far away from each other (10.x
and 192.168.x), with defining a 'all your base belong to us' netmask in
the code e.g. 0.0.0.0 :)
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:10:43AM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> My mistake, didn't checked that you allready did my math. ;)
> Do you have experience with changing"#define IFCONFIG_POOL_MIN_NETBITS
> 16", is it realy so simple?
I haven't tested it, but from looking at the code, it should work
My mistake, didn't checked that you allready did my math. ;)
Do you have experience with changing"#define IFCONFIG_POOL_MIN_NETBITS
16", is it realy so simple?
The best way for me would be to define 2 different /16 networks on one
server/instance.
E.g. 172.16.0.0/16 and 10.1.0.0/16
Is it possibl
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 03:02:17PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> We are also using old openvpn clients with windows, there we have to use
> /30 netmasks (4 ip's) and can only configure 4096 users.
65536 / 4 = 16000 :-) - a /16 pool holds 2^16 addresses, I already took
that into account when a
We are also using old openvpn clients with windows, there we have to use
/30 netmasks (4 ip's) and can only configure 4096 users.
To handle the load on the machines we build a cluster with dynamic
routing and yes, we are getting close to the /16 network limit.
Am 31.08.2010 13:31, schrieb Ge
Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
on one openvpn instance?
I assume that you're talking about t
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> In the past only /16 networks were possibel per openvpn instance.
> Is it now possibel to define larger networks or define 2x /16 networks
> on one openvpn instance?
I assume that you're talking about this error message:
--se
